Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FT8\s+contest\s+frequencies\s+for\s+144\,\s+222\,\s+432\,\s+1296\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest frequencies for 144, 222, 432, 1296 (score: 1)
Author: Jamie Dupree <jamie.dupree@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:12:12 +0000 (UTC)
Other than 6 meters, is there any settled/suggested frequency list for FT8 operations in a VHF contest on 144, 222, 432, and 1296? 73 Jamie NS3T _______________________________________________ VHFcon
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00019.html (7,444 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest frequencies for 144, 222, 432, 1296 (score: 1)
Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:26:59 +0000 (UTC)
Here in Florida, we are using: 144.174 (used every Monday night starting around 2015 EST) 222.080 (proposed, but I doubt if it has been used) 432.174 (used every Thursday night, after the FLWSS net o
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00020.html (8,073 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest frequencies for 144, 222, 432, 1296 (score: 1)
Author: <barry@k7bwh.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:41:46 -0800
For what it's worth, the Pacific Northwest has generally agreed on these FT8 frequencies after discussion at our last conference: 50.313 144.174 222.080 432.500 1296.074 However, there is no WSJT act
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00024.html (9,097 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest frequencies for 144, 222, 432, 1296 (score: 1)
Author: James C <jabeco@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:01:23 -0800
Howdy all, To echo Barry, These are the frequencies that get used in the PNW.. There are a number of stations that DO run WJST modes on 144mhz and above out here outside of contests. 144 & 222 get us
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00025.html (11,044 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest frequencies for 144, 222, 432, 1296 (score: 1)
Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 23:33:41 +0000 (UTC)
A few comments: 50.313  and 144.174 are pretty well established frequencies - they are already programmed into the software. Apparently some people agreed on 222.080. I do not know about elsewhere, b
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00026.html (8,971 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest frequencies for 144, 222, 432, 1296 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Klimas WZ1V" <wz1v@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 19:12:46 -0500
Buddy: I agree .174 is a far better choice than .500 and no need to go below .100 on those bands. What I'd like to see moved is 144.174 - way to close to the center of SSB-CW terrestrial work. But wh
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00027.html (10,347 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest frequencies for 144, 222, 432, 1296 (score: 1)
Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:20:14 +0000 (UTC)
I agree about 144.174. But, it is in use. It is in the software. Could be hard to change. But, when you start going lower in the band, people complain about interfering with EME. You could go higher.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00028.html (10,548 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest frequencies for 144, 222, 432, 1296 (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:30:53 -0800
In my experience in South West VE7 Land and the PNW during contests SSB / CW activity on 144 MHz generally seems to go up from 144.200 in 10 KHz steps. I realize in an area where significant SSB/CW a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00029.html (12,387 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu