Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FT8\s+contest\s+mode\s+incompatibly\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:35:45 -0600
Anyone seriously operating this weekends contest and using FT8 probably had this happen. You're cruising .313 looking for those new mults or whatever, you see someone CQing WITHOUT the word TEST in t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00042.html (9,684 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Dave <kdcarlso@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:49:22 -0400
I had the same issue in January with a VE3. I emailed with him suggested he switch to CM and he explained that he wasn't using WSJT-X and won't until they fix it because it doesn't work on his PC (In
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00043.html (10,780 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Kim <whensley11@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:53:52 -0500 (CDT)
Good morning, Keith. I ran across this with a couple of stations in the Caribbean area. I quickly switched out of contest mode, made the Q, and then returned to contest mode. Didn't do it too many ti
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00044.html (10,658 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Klimas WZ1V" <wz1v@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:09:59 -0400
Many stations observed on 6M were not in contest mode. Sometimes (but not always) had to switch to standard mode to complete. However, I edited my Macro to just send CQ WZ1V in contest mode, instead
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00045.html (12,115 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Harry Blakeman <aspengold4@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:11:38 -0600
For the last 3 contests I've turned off JTDX and turned on WSJTX. Yesterday mostly a problem with non A, K, and W calls who were sending AGN AGN or SIG RPT. I also started ignoring those stations who
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00046.html (11,979 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:15:12 -0500
Just check the "RR73" button and he will finish. You might have to manually fill in the grid from his CQ to log it. Chuck W5PR _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing li
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00047.html (12,811 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: "Lloyd - N9LB" <lloydberg@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:14:05 -0500
I experienced this all weekend too - about 50% of attempted contacts. I also observed this after the contest when people were still calling "CQ Test" to indicate that a quick QSO, w/o the funny numbe
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00048.html (11,739 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: "George Sintchak" <wa2vnv@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:20:55 -0400
Hi Jay. What version were you running, and/or is it a clone? I was using the v2.0.1 in contest mode and also saw CQ's without the test and wked many without a problem or the funny numbers, actually n
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00050.html (12,799 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:33:13 -0400
I did exactly the same, and it seemed to resolve the problem every time. I also noticed that quite a number of operators were savvy enough to advance their messages manually when needed. 73, --Alex K
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00051.html (9,006 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Alan Larson <wa6azp@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:02:10 -0700
TEST If the signals were 20 over 9, why were they operating FT8? Alan _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00053.html (9,090 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Hewlett via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:32:08 +0000 (UTC)
Good Question! TEST   If the signals were 20 over 9, why were they operating FT8?         Alan _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00055.html (9,984 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Jonesy W3DHJ via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:44:50 -0600 (MDT)
They aren't hams. They are asocial computer operators. No need for the awkward exchanges of: "It's good to hear you again."; "Thanks for roving."; "Thanks for the new grid."; "BIG Signal!"; "You got
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00056.html (9,727 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: John Kludt <johnnykludt@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 15:40:59 -0400
Guys, Okay I think this enough of this. There are any number of why's to enjoy ham radio and yet some seem to feel that anyone who does not enjoy ham radio "their way" isn't a ham. At Contest Univers
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00057.html (10,941 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 15:24:17 -0600
And, you can't ask EASILY them to QSY to your other bands. Is this part of the 2M and up lack of QSO's problem we're seeing all around the country ? Guys, I don't care what you personally think of WS
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00058.html (10,265 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Gregory Winters <greg_winters@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:10:52 +0000
It doesn't seem too much to ask to have that drop out box option as you suggested. Is there a way to tell if THEY call CQ which mode they are in? I don't know why the program can't toggle back and fo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00059.html (13,864 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Steve Kavanagh via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:36:14 +0000 (UTC)
I looked through the manual for the general availability release of JTDX and could not find any mention of NA VHF Contest Mode. Not sure about the latest evaluation version...I didn't see a manual. A
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00060.html (8,838 bytes)

17. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:10:01 -0700
After reflecting a bit on a recent back country grid activation in an area known for Grizzly bears I do see some more merit in modes that don't require a lot of operator involvement. Initially during
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00064.html (13,068 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu