Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FT8\s+on\s+222\s+\&\s+432\s+during\s+SPRINT\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] FT8 on 222 & 432 during SPRINT (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:47:35 -0600
Now that the Sprint events (above 6M, obviously) where FT8 would most probably be used are over, have we come to a consensus on exactly which frequency we're all using for the mode ? I mentioned this
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-04/msg00029.html (8,270 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 on 222 & 432 during SPRINT (score: 1)
Author: Dave <kdcarlso@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:56:37 -0400
.174 seems to be it in the Northeast and why not keep it consistent across bands. It makes it easy to remember. Dave N2OA _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VH
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-04/msg00030.html (8,646 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 on 222 & 432 during SPRINT (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:27:03 -0700
I am rather ambivalent about the exact frequencies so long as I know where the action is likely to be in and around the PNW. It was unclear to me until just before the Sprint what frequency to use. T
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-04/msg00032.html (10,434 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 on 222 & 432 during SPRINT (score: 1)
Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:34:02 +0000 (UTC)
The Florida Weak Signal Society recommended FT8 frequencies are .174, on all bands, 2M and higher in frequency. Now my (personal) comments: 144.174 was probably a poor choice. But, it has been in the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-04/msg00033.html (8,815 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 on 222 & 432 during SPRINT (score: 1)
Author: "Lloyd - N9LB" <lloydberg@tds.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:41:23 -0500
I run transverters on the VHF/UHF bands and the ability to keep the HF "IF Rig" on .174 has many benefits. I would like to see .174 continue to be the FT8 standard frequency on 144 MHz and above. 73
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-04/msg00035.html (9,396 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 on 222 & 432 during SPRINT (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:02:53 -0600
The choice of frequency makes little difference to me, either. But, it's had to find guys if every little region has its own 'channel'. If there truly is a consensus on FT8 (and meteor scatter) frequ
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-04/msg00036.html (12,659 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 on 222 & 432 during SPRINT (score: 1)
Author: James C <jabeco@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:08:09 -0700
I don't care about 432 digital other then the established eme sub band, However I can speak to 222 digi with plenty of actual on the air experience. 222.080 is a 'catch all' frequency. I've run JT65,
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-04/msg00037.html (11,966 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 on 222 & 432 during SPRINT (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:27:57 -0700
Hi Jay. Yes I agree more standardization on Frequencies is probably a good thing. For some reason I had a bit more uncertainty about the 432 FT8 frequency than I did for the 144 and 222 frequencies d
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-04/msg00038.html (13,751 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 on 222 & 432 during SPRINT (score: 1)
Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:54:25 +0000 (UTC)
Yes, QRM on the M/S frequencies is occasionally a problem. When I hear another station, coming in via ground wave, I find something else to do. Personal opinion, if you are working a Sked, don't do i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-04/msg00039.html (9,659 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu