Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+HF\s+net\s+again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+HF\s+net\s+again\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] HF net again (score: 1): Author: "frank bechdoldt" <k3uhf@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:47:08 -0700; I'll put the old thread to rest. We do have more band privilages on 40 meters and 80 now so maybe theres a quiet spot on 80 meters. I ran it on 2 and 80 so the no code techs could play along. However; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00145.html (7,012 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] HF net again (score: 1): Author: steve d <kc8qvo@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:54:34 -0700 (PDT); I think having a net would be a benifit, however I dont know how many people would really take part. With the internet these days that pretty much takes the place of an on-air net. The only restricti; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00147.html (7,007 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]