Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+IC\-7000\s+\-\s+Best\s+VHF\s+contesting\s+rig\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+IC\-7000\s+\-\s+Best\s+VHF\s+contesting\s+rig\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] IC-7000 - Best VHF contesting rig? (score: 1): Author: "jon jones" <n0jk@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 02:21:12 +0000; There is a nice review of the IC-7000 in the May 2006 issue of QST starting page 64. The review notes "ICOM got most everything right with this radio, and it offers a lot of enjoyment in one compact; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00222.html (8,776 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC-7000 - Best VHF contesting rig? (score: 1): Author: Bruce Herrick <bdh@teleport.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 20:39:20 -0600; The problem with the QST review is that after the comment about the multimode transciever the reviewer goes on to talk about repeater offsets, nonstandard splits, CTCSS encode/decode, and other FM st; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00223.html (9,372 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] IC-7000 - Best VHF contesting rig? (score: 1): Author: "jon jones" <n0jk@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 03:27:29 +0000; multimode transciever the reviewer goes on to talk about repeater offsets, nonstandard splits, CTCSS encode/decode, and other FM stuff, and says not a word about the rig's weak signal VHF/UHF perfor; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00224.html (7,831 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]