Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+IC706MK2G\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+IC706MK2G\s+Question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] IC706MK2G Question (score: 1): Author: KA2AEV@aol.com; Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 20:56:30 EDT; Hola Have a late model IC706MK2G Book sez that the output is 50w on 2m. I have a Brick that takes 25w's in and puts out @150w Has anyone done or heard of someone who has checked the 706 for initial s; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00024.html (6,429 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC706MK2G Question (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 18:13:03 -0700 (PDT); QST says the problem is better in the 706MKIIG, but they never said it was completely eliminated. I would think you could turn down the power internally, which would definitely eliminate the problem.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00025.html (8,064 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC706MK2G Question (score: 1): Author: "David L. Martin" <dlmarti@kc2lcf.net>; Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 21:47:08 -0400; The '706 mailling lists were a-buzz with this a few months ago. A few people did claim that saw this problem, others claimed it didn't exist. The claim was that even turned down to a lower power, the; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00026.html (8,291 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC706MK2G Question (score: 1): Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 14:21:41 -0500; 50 watts to 150 watts is only about 4 dB, not hardly even an S-unit at the recieve end. Some people will use a piece of feedline between the two with enough loss to "limit" the power that goes to the; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00028.html (7,750 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]