Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Icom\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Icom\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Icom (score: 1): Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:42 2003; In the May, 2003 issue of QST, there is a page 1 advertisement for the new Icom IC-703, an HF QRP radio with the same form factor and front panel design as the IC-706MkIIG. In the ad, Icom seems to t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01664.html (8,330 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Icom (score: 1): Author: k9ij@vx5.com (John K9IJ); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:42 2003; I note that the built in tuner only tunes a 50 ohm antenna, also. How many light portable 50 ohm HF antennas are there out there ? I don't think they thought this one out very well. John - K9IJ - Joh; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01665.html (8,366 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] ICOM (score: 1): Author: n0jk@hotmail.com (jon jones); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:42 2003; I just received my May 2003 QST and saw the ICOM ad for the '703 too, Ken. 6 Meters is a "VHF" band, ICOM! And there is considerable QRP activity on 2 Meters and up. I use an old IC-490A for QRP SSB/; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01668.html (8,307 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] ICOM (score: 1): Author: k9ij@vx5.com (John K9IJ); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:42 2003; Everybody going to Dayton should stop by the ICOM booth and explain to them the definition of an HT, the fact that they haven't made a VHF/UHF SSB 'HT" in many years, and that the 703 has nothing rea; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01669.html (8,729 bytes)
5. [VHFcontesting] ICOM (score: 1): Author: crawfish@surfmore.net (Crawfish); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:42 2003; operators: were; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01670.html (9,216 bytes)
6. [VHFcontesting] ICOM (score: 1): Author: dross@sirinet.net (Donald M. Ross); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:42 2003; Saw the ad. What does the phrase "A VHF/UHF rig is called an HT" mean about the IC-910H? Are they now selling a battery pack for it? What about a rubber duck? Don, NL7CO operators: were _____________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01671.html (9,947 bytes)
7. [VHFcontesting] ICOM (score: 1): Author: hmbetz@acc-net.com (Mike Betz); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:42 2003; TO ALL WEAK SIGNAL OPS: Now you know what ICOM really thinks about you....Best ad for a Yaesu I have ever heard....hi de Mike K8ROX EN80ko -- Original Message -- From: "John K9IJ" <k9ij@vx5.com> To:; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01672.html (9,709 bytes)
8. [VHFcontesting] ICOM (score: 1): Author: clem.law@usa.net (Richard Clem); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:43 2003; I think they should have done a bit more market research. One of the reasons I bought an FT-817 was BECAUSE it had a built-in HT! When I bought it, I assumed that I would use it mostly for two thing; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01676.html (8,244 bytes)
9. [VHFcontesting] ICOM (score: 1): Author: k0emt@dbBear.com (Bryan - k0emt); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:43 2003; To add to what some of the others said, ICOM really goofed on this one. All they had to do was go to the FT-817 group archives and see the wish list of items for a mk II. If the 703 had all-mode VHF/; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01680.html (7,774 bytes)
10. [VHFcontesting] ICOM (score: 1): Author: gmills@frontiernet.net (Greg Mills); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:43 2003; Sounds like some of us want the inverse of the 703, a "709". No HF, but would have 6m, 2m, 432... maybe it would be a "cheap" radio then? Would that make room for 220 or 1296 or maybe 900? Oops, that; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01681.html (8,690 bytes)
11. [VHFcontesting] ICOM (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:43 2003; It's funny how times change. Back in the early 80's it was Icom who took VHF/UHF SSB/CW seriously when the others didn't, now they seemed to be dropping the ball pretty left and right for some reason; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01683.html (9,082 bytes)
12. [VHFcontesting] ICOM (score: 1): Author: wbr@verizon.net (WBR WF4R); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:43 2003; I think maybe the manufacturers should read this reflector. Then they might get an idea of what to sell. I for one would like to see a manufacture support the 222 band with an all mode. 6, 2, 432 see; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01689.html (9,709 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]