ARRL has posted the QST results for the June VHF QSO Party and UHF Contest on the ARRL Members Only webpage at: http://www.arrl.org/contests/results/ These write-ups are apparently the new ones to ap
Very poor coverage indeed. No regional boxes. Total top 10 boxes are near meaningless for VHF contests. I think the ARRL should get out the contest arena and let organizations that care about contest
Yep, I now see what the ARRL plan is......you have to be a member of the League to get to the good, useful data, when it finally gets listed !!! The "Scores" area has not yet been posted for the June
I thought that AA7A did a good writeup of this years June contest. I would suggest to anyone who would like to see something diffrent or indeed feel they can do a better writeup or have some ideas on
Yes, Ned's report was probably the most balanced VHF contest report I have ever read. Too short, but I'm sure that is all the space he was given. Great job Ned! 73, Robert KR7O/YB2ARO, DM07ba/OI52ee
The prose is fine. I am not complaining about what is there. I am complaining about what is missing. And yes I know the author has little control over this, which is why I aimed my complaints at the
Two things that annoy me lately... o People who "imply information to fit their agenda" o Lame websites On the topic of the first... What the ARRL decided was that they could redirect $100,000 a year
The eham and contesting.com sites suck and are lame? You've got to be kidding. I hope so Ev. Pardon the personal bias here, but just to be very clear, the VHF contesting list, and it's operation has
Hi Bob, I will add N5NJ to my list of public appologies. In attempting to add a little gradeschool humor (where the terms "suck" and "lame" are bantied about with great abandon) to my frustration, I