Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+LOTW\s+and\s+VHF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+LOTW\s+and\s+VHF\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 16:36:52 -0500; 42 Qs in the ARRL contest but only 11 confirmed via LOTW. That's low. In a RTTY contest I'd be over 50% by this long after the contest. Even an HF contest like SS would net me more than that by now.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00071.html (7,382 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Herb Krumich via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 15:54:12 -0700; Pete I think the biggest problem is old timers like myself, have so many QSL's and done almost everything that can be done on VHF, I have no reason to join LOTW. That's probably the biggest problem 7; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00072.html (8,252 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Tad Danley <tdanley@suddenlink.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:01:29 -0500; Hi Pete, I agree. Logbook of the World has become much easier to configure and use, and I think that will help. Something else that will help is many logging programs integrate easily with LotW which; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00073.html (8,984 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 19:06:25 -0400; Hi Herb If you have "been there, done that" as far as VHF challenges, then you may as well sell all your gear, and enjoy your QSL collection. Just kidding! There is always new challenges to keep thin; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00074.html (10,166 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:15:54 -0500; I see very poor percentage of VHF QSO's on LoTW. I do see a very high percentage (relatively) for any digital QSO's on LoTW. I have noticed an extreme change to QSL's in general on VHF, at one time i; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00077.html (9,667 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:37:38 -0500; I got mine electronic-only; sat on 99 for the longest time. :-) I have ~230 worked and about 120 confirmed on LOTW (and a few more on cards). I'm getting itchy-close to that 125 sticker. :-) Even tho; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00079.html (8,510 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:59:34 -0500; Cheaper, too. QSL (W4MPY) - $0.128 Postage both ways - $0.98 Total - $1.27 per QSL mailed. I could economize by printing my own QSLs and may do that when I run out of my current batch. I could save a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00080.html (9,441 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:12:48 -0400; Domestic postage in Canada is now $1.15. More to the U.S., and even more everywhere else. No discount for postcards. Guess we just keep pointing out the advantages, and get folks to convert, one at a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00082.html (10,841 bytes)
9. Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:18:59 -0500; HF, too, now that you mention it. Even in the early oughties, if I worked a few hundred in SS, I'd get cards the next couple weeks, but I don't know when the last time was that I got a SASE or a post; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00083.html (9,173 bytes)
10. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:22:56 -0500; Ah, yes. Canada Post Corporation. I'll just leave it there but having lived in H9H at one time, I feel your pain. I think, like VIA Rail, their purpose is to dissuade you from using their service. :-; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00084.html (8,784 bytes)
11. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: "Dave Olean" <k1whs@metrocast.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:35:57 -0400; About 5 1/2 years ago, I joined up on LOTW. I had entered most all of my EME and VHF DX contacts on 144and other VHF bands into my computer logging program. I went back to 1974, and have about 75% en; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00087.html (10,633 bytes)
12. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: "Dan Evans" <dan.evans@insightbb.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:29:41 -0400; I'm afraid I'm one of the hold outs... I tried setting up LOTW a couple of years ago, and ran into problems. Got the postcard from the ARRL, and had tons of trouble getting the software to work... Fi; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00088.html (9,683 bytes)
13. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: "Walt Murphy" <n2wm@nj.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:47:16 -0400; I just uploaded 750+ qso's from June VHF for the W2LV operation. LoTW had about 150 matches on 6 meters, none on 2 or above. The problem as I see it is VHF types do not upload current or old QSOs to; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00089.html (12,382 bytes)
14. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Paul Kiesel via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:03:29 -0700; I already told everyone how I feel about QSLing. My idea of a real asset is a person who will respond to my request for a QSL card when I send him an SASE along with my card. So far, I'm batting almo; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00090.html (13,927 bytes)
15. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: "Chet S" <chetsubaccount@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 20:10:04 -0400; Then something is wrong. I uploaded my log the day after the June contest. There should have been a match with you on the lower 4 bands. Chet, N8RA I just uploaded 750+ qso's from June VHF for the W2; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00091.html (13,425 bytes)
16. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:48:46 -0500; TQSL prior to v1.12 (I think) was bad. As in ugly. It worked, but man. v1.13 was the first that had been massaged by the new team. They eventually rolled out a v2 and it's MUCH improved. The two sepa; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00092.html (12,043 bytes)
17. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:54:26 -0500; Thanks! You confirmed FN21 for me from a QSO In 2010 which I used to get VUCC. :-) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ VHFcontes; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00093.html (9,593 bytes)
18. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Mike Metroka via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:45:59 -0500; I set up my LoTW account a couple of years ago and I won't go back. The HF digital crowd is VERY good at turning in their logs. Many HF contesters also upload their logs every time out. VHFers missed; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00094.html (11,924 bytes)
19. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:34:41 -0600; LoTW has gotten much better. Still a bit of a hassle to set up but carefully follow the directions and it works. It is fun to watch my VUCC count increase after a contest or just whenever someone new; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00095.html (10,340 bytes)
20. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:57:12 -0500; Thanks for doing that. I uploaded all the QSOs from when I was a Novice (not really, I was a Technician Plus but I was working on my code speed to upgrade) even though I'll never claim an award with; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00097.html (10,103 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]