Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Leveling\s+the\s+playing\s+field\s+$rover\s+part\s+II$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Leveling\s+the\s+playing\s+field\s+$rover\s+part\s+II$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Leveling the playing field (rover part II) (score: 1): Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:27:52 -0500; You know we can make changes. A few years ago I had swapped a few emails with Gene, W3ZZ based, upon some posts on a list about how for field day (FD) the EOC stations were at a disadvantage during F; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-07/msg00118.html (7,866 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Leveling the playing field (rover part II) (score: 1): Author: "Eric Smith" <kb7dqh@donobi.net>; Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 12:00:36 -0700; Section multipliers??? The section is part of the exchange, but does not a multiplier make in Field Day... Not only that, there is a "C" class, mobile stations... which, if they happen to end up in a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-07/msg00120.html (9,147 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]