Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+New\s+rules\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+New\s+rules\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] New rules? (score: 1): Author: Bruce Herrick <bdh@teleport.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:05:24 -0500 (GMT-05:00); ARRL Seeks Input on Initial VHF+ Contest Rule Changes Dear fellow Amateurs, The Programs & Services Committee of the ARRL Board recognizes the need to review and update various aspects of the League'; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-11/msg00006.html (14,279 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] New rules? (score: 1): Author: Keith Morehouse <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 01:39:55 +0000; W9RM _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-11/msg00007.html (17,724 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] New rules? (score: 1): Author: Roger Rehr <73w3sz@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:04:56 +1300; Same for me...got the email back as being rejected by the ARRL server...was waiting for confirmation that it wasn't "just me" before posting to the group :) 73, Roger Rehr W3SZ ______________________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-11/msg00008.html (7,988 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]