Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Operator\s+versus\s+technology\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Operator\s+versus\s+technology\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Operator versus technology (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree); Date: Thu Jul 24 12:56:13 2003; Perhaps this lively discussion of CU2QSO is about something a little bigger than just one issue. KE3HT has some interesting points, basically asking if CU2QSO is okay, why isn't ARPS with appropriate; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00165.html (10,098 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Operator versus technology (score: 1): Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV)); Date: Thu Jul 24 23:29:24 2003; If you can say the above, then I can say this... o Simplex SSB CQing is Voice Spotting with "appropriate configuration" o CU2QSO is APRS with "appropriate configuration" If it's "appropriately config; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00176.html (8,531 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Operator versus technology (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree); Date: Fri Jul 25 00:48:57 2003; Ev I like CW a lot. However, I realize it isn't for everyone. I don't keep trying to pretend that everyone should like it. Tree; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00180.html (7,089 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] Operator versus technology (score: 1): Author: k1ep@mgef.org (Ed K1EP); Date: Fri Jul 25 06:07:34 2003; I have been reading a lot of this discussion. Let me preface my remarks with the following: o I have not used CU2QSO o I have read the demo webpage and believe I understand its operation o I have not; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00182.html (9,794 bytes)
5. [VHFcontesting] Operator versus technology (score: 1): Author: list@rwitte.com (Bob Witte); Date: Fri Jul 25 22:36:16 2003; Yeah, just like all those guys calling "CQ"....they are "self-spotting"... what were they thinking??? Perhaps they shouldn't be allowed to indicate their location in their CQ, including grid locator; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00196.html (7,716 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]