Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Propoer\s+use\s+of\s+Call\s+Frequencies\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Propoer\s+use\s+of\s+Call\s+Frequencies\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Propoer use of Call Frequencies (score: 1): Author: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 07:04:34 -0400; I would like to ask some questions to make sure I understand some things. 1. What is the current suggested protocol for using the call frequencies in contest now and why does it not work? 2. What is; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00255.html (7,185 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Propoer use of Call Frequencies (score: 1): Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 07:09:03 -0700 (PDT); The current protocol is one in which you maximize your score by operating as competitively as you can without alienating the fellow competitors on which you rely in order to maximize that score. The; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00257.html (8,569 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Propoer use of Call Frequencies (score: 1): Author: "crawfish" <crawfish@surfmore.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 13:38:33 -0500; 4 meter band sounds good, except for those pesky Channel 4 and 5 TV transmitters:-). I understand that there was mention of an 8 meter band being considered, since lots of commercial folks were vacat; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00266.html (10,111 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Propoer use of Call Frequencies (score: 1): Author: Dan_K9ZF <n9rla@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:18:41 -0400; clip clip Wow, wouldn't that be great! :-) 73 Dan -- K9ZF /R no budget Rover **QRP-l #1269 Check out the Rover Resource Page at: <http://www.qsl.net/n9rla> List Administrator for: InHam+grid-loc+ham-; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00278.html (8,215 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]