Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+\[VHF\]\s+ARRL\s+VHF\+\s+contest\s+proposals\:\s+inputinvited\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+\[VHF\]\s+ARRL\s+VHF\+\s+contest\s+proposals\:\s+inputinvited\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: [VHF] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: inputinvited (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:36:16 -0500; jon jones wrote: As the new Midwest Division representative to the CAC (and a long time VHF Contester) I will be following the comments on this Reflector to Tom K1KI's recommendations closely to help; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00046.html (8,376 bytes)
2. re: [VHFcontesting] Re: [VHF] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: inputinvited (score: 1): Author: "Dave Wendling" <kb1eaa@berkshire.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:27:00 -0500; I would like to see less use of the word more. So much for my new HO loops. How would a rule change make people who are not interested participate? KE3HT might be correct. What we need is change in; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00058.html (7,588 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]