Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+ARRL\s+VHF\+\s+contest\s+proposals\:\s+input\s+invited\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited (score: 1)
Author: Richard Clem <clem.law@usa.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:01:07 -0600
I would suggest not haing any category defined as 50-144-432 only, as it strikes me as an admission that 222 somehow isn't a real ham band. There is very little activity on that band, and it seems to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00087.html (9,114 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:19:26 -0500
For those of you that have not operated 222 before or reluctant to purchase equipment for that band, you need to reconsider. For a long time now that band has been under pressure to be taken over by
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00091.html (7,874 bytes)

3. RE: [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited (score: 1)
Author: "John Wilcox / NS1Z" <ns1z@gwi.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:09:19 -0000
If the League really were serious about increasing activity on 220 it would make the points for contacts on that band, during a contest, double or triple what they are for 430. The points are arbitra
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00092.html (10,016 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:45:35 GMT
I agree with these statements and would like to see 222 used more casusaly, plus more activity in contests. Where I am, there is no activity outside of the few contests a operate a year. I would love
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00094.html (9,336 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Evans" <n9rla@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:42:15 -0500
My thoughts on the proposals, de K9ZF/R Section 1) Change Rover Rules Subparagraph A) Reverting to old Rover rules. I started Roving after the change to the new rules, so this isn't a big issue with
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00100.html (14,450 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu