Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+Knight\s+T\-175\s+amp\s+good\s+or\s+bad\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+Knight\s+T\-175\s+amp\s+good\s+or\s+bad\?\?\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: Knight T-175 amp good or bad??? (score: 1): Author: Cboone@earthlink.net (Cboone@earthlink.net); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:01 2003; If memory serves, the T-175 is a great little amp for six meters.. I have never heard anything bad about them...they of course were sold as a compliment to the T-150 xmtr....I THINK it uses 811s (cor; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00869.html (7,936 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Re: Knight T-175 amp good or bad??? (score: 1): Author: parinc@gte.net (Dale Parfitt); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:01 2003; More likely it was designed for the T-60 transmitter. The T-150 was already a hi power transmitter. Dale W4OP; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00870.html (7,785 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Re: Knight T-175 amp good or bad??? (score: 1): Author: RR124640@Exchange.AtlantaGA.NCR.com (Rogers, Ron); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:01 2003; No, it was designed as the matching amplifier for the TR-106 6 meter AM transceiver. Same cabinetry and paint scheme. In fact, if you look on the side of a T-175 cabinet you will notice the 2 holes f; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00871.html (8,349 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] Re: Knight T-175 amp good or bad??? (score: 1): Author: Cboone@earthlink.net (Cboone@earthlink.net); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:01 2003; Ron posted the correct info....it was designed as an amp for the low power AM rigs (the 106 and 108...I really need more coffee ;) but then it has been years since I saw a 175.... And yes it does use; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00873.html (8,386 bytes)
5. [VHFcontesting] Re: Knight T-175 amp good or bad??? (score: 1): Author: Cboone@earthlink.net (Cboone@earthlink.net); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:01 2003; If memory serves, the T-175 is a great little amp for six meters.. I have never heard anything bad about them...they of course were sold as a compliment to the T-150 xmtr....I THINK it uses 811s (cor; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2002-03/msg00002.html (7,936 bytes)
6. [VHFcontesting] Re: Knight T-175 amp good or bad??? (score: 1): Author: parinc@gte.net (Dale Parfitt); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:01 2003; More likely it was designed for the T-60 transmitter. The T-150 was already a hi power transmitter. Dale W4OP; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2002-03/msg00003.html (7,785 bytes)
7. [VHFcontesting] Re: Knight T-175 amp good or bad??? (score: 1): Author: RR124640@Exchange.AtlantaGA.NCR.com (Rogers, Ron); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:01 2003; No, it was designed as the matching amplifier for the TR-106 6 meter AM transceiver. Same cabinetry and paint scheme. In fact, if you look on the side of a T-175 cabinet you will notice the 2 holes f; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2002-03/msg00004.html (8,316 bytes)
8. [VHFcontesting] Re: Knight T-175 amp good or bad??? (score: 1): Author: Cboone@earthlink.net (Cboone@earthlink.net); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:01 2003; Ron posted the correct info....it was designed as an amp for the low power AM rigs (the 106 and 108...I really need more coffee ;) but then it has been years since I saw a 175.... And yes it does use; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2002-03/msg00007.html (8,408 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]