Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\s+4\s+meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\s+4\s+meters\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re 4 meters (score: 1): Author: "Vic" <wb4slm@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:23:21 -0400; 4m is alive & well -- I copied signals on 20 June here in EM82 and was hoping for a 4 to 6 meter crossband -- Mike, VE9AA, did have a crossband & perhaps the first "recorded" in history .. if one is; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00190.html (7,778 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re 4 meters (score: 1): Author: "Eric Smith" <kb7dqh@donobi.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:30:45 -0700; Got tons of 66-88Mhz stuff left over from the other users of the space between TV channels 4 and 5... Paging companies!!! Many systems, back in the "dark ages" before satellite data communications, u; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00200.html (9,644 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re 4 meters (score: 1): Author: "crawfish" <crawfish@surfmore.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:30:37 -0500; The heck with 4m, I want 5 meters back!! We can bridge 6m and 5m and have a REAL big band!! There was talk at one time about a band at 9m(around 40 mHz) for hams. I think 2 bands is enough. That way; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00205.html (11,386 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]