Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Rover\s+Circling\s+Solution\s+\[was\:\s+ARRL\s+VHF\+\s+contestproposals\:\s+input\s+invited\]\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Circling Solution [was: ARRL VHF+ contestproposals: input invited] (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hiers" <aa4ga@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:38:36 -0500
B-L-A-T-T! We have a loser. I remember back in the California QSO party a few years back, early in the morning, I was operating mobile and the rules stated that you had to work at least 10 guys from
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00047.html (9,723 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Circling Solution [was: ARRL VHF+ contestproposals: input invited] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:23:49 -0500
Lee Hiers wrote: "Once operation has ceased, the same grid may not be re-activated by the same moving station in the same contest. Operation in a previous grid is considered 'ceased' as soon as a sin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00057.html (10,753 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Circling Solution [was: ARRL VHF+ contestproposals: input invited] (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hiers" <aa4ga@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:37:09 -0500
Your proposal, as K8MR stated, is stupid. You *really* don't get it, do you? Legitimate, as in: an activity which is within the spirit of the rules. The reason your example of QSOs between a multi-op
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00059.html (10,555 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Circling Solution [was: ARRL VHF+ contestproposals: input invited] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 23:07:18 -0500
John K9IJ wrote: There are a lot of rovers that squeeze rover activity into other activities in their busy days. Commuting to and from a work location, for example. Telling those people that they can
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00062.html (11,613 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Circling Solution [was: ARRL VHF+ contestproposals: input invited] (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:20:25 -0600
Yeah - you would wonder what the fun would be in spending all weekend working two other people. 2004 ARRL Jan VHF - Claimed Scores 19Feb2004 Call QSOs Mults hr Score Club Rover HP N6NB 1415 180 20 1,
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00075.html (11,689 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Circling Solution [was: ARRL VHF+ contestproposals: input invited] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:20:50 -0500
Dan Evans wrote: I know absolutely that here in the midwest there's absolutely no way that we can compete head to head with the east coast and west coast rovers. Nor do we need to. We are all scored
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00076.html (11,602 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu