Since I have heard nothing but criticism about the current rover rules on this reflector over the past 2 years or so, I am interested as to how the rover rules should read? Would any of the critics c
John asked about the rule idea, Rule idea: A simple fix as recommended in 2004 and aired out here quite a few times well before the last 2 sets of at least partially ineffective changes would read so
Well I think the 100Q rover to rover limit is counter productive, I would like to see that gone. I had a great time pack roving in the August and September contests. In September we had a pack of nin
Unfortunately, this hypothesized rule has the potential to hurt "non-grid circling" rovers and prohibit completely valid "non-grid circling QSOs." Let's say I live in an area with high rover activity
Frank, My eskip idea was brought up to your rule number #2, where after the first 100 QSOs you could only work rovers for 10% of the remaining QSOs. I was saying that during a good Es opening a rover
charset="iso-8859-1"; visited My question is posed to Jim, but any of you are free to supply an answer. I went to the packroving website. You guys have been smoking me score wise ever since you star
Bruce, No disagreement from me. When I operate in a category other than rover I get smoked by the guys back east. It will always be that way because of their higher population density and superior pr
Bruce, You didn't move any rover you worked from one band to another? If so, I would call that an orchestrated QSO of sorts at least. 73s John AA5JG _______________________________________________ VH
Wow .. sounds like a blast .. take someone else's stuff, strap it onto your car, drive around and talk to each other. No tuning necessary, don't know why you waste money on rotators and antennas .. I
We go through this every single time and I can never get a decent answer to a question. If you want to pack-rove, what is wrong with being an Unlimited Rover? The answer is very simple guys. Unlimite