- 1. [VHFcontesting] Rover teams (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:28:23 -0600
- While half joking when I threw the team concept out that may be a workable solution too. A circling group could declare themselves a team, work each other as often as they like, and as many others as
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00097.html (7,417 bytes)
- 2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover teams (score: 1)
- Author: "John D'Ausilio" <jdausilio@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:22:49 -0500
- Isn't that sort of what unlimited rover is supposed to be? It would be a small step to convert "unlimited" to "team", score them like multi-multis, the teams can compete independently of the classics
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00102.html (8,171 bytes)
- 3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover teams (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:45:08 -0600
- Operative word ... supposed. Bottom line we can all moan groan bitch and belly-ache but if we don't have discussions we don't have solutions to in some's minds, serious problems. And moaning, groanin
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00104.html (7,629 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu