Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+SDR1000\s+vs\s+6m\s+xvtr\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+SDR1000\s+vs\s+6m\s+xvtr\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] SDR1000 vs 6m xvtr (score: 1): Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:47:40 -0800; I am curious if anyone has done any comparisons of the built-in 6m capability of the SDR1000 vs the SDR1000 as an IF for a DEMI or SSB 6m transverter. I am particularly interested in strong signal ha; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00106.html (7,362 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] SDR1000 vs 6m xvtr (score: 1): Author: kb8u vhf <kb8u_vhf@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:00:23 +0000; The SDR1000 has a LOT of birdies on 6m, especially near 50Mhz. It is also not terribly sensitive so I'd reccommend using a transverter if you have one available. -Russ KB8U __________________________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00115.html (8,052 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] SDR1000 vs 6m xvtr (score: 1): Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com; Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:58:01 -0800; Thanks for your response Russ. Since I think you were the only person (I think) to reply to the reflector I will reply here also. Your response seems to be the consensus of the several replies I rece; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00116.html (10,651 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] SDR1000 vs 6m xvtr (score: 1): Author: "Anthony Rick" <asrick@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:10:16 -0600; If you like the ICOMs otherwise, you may want to consider the INRAD roofing filter upgrade. I don't have any personal experience with this modification but the spectrum sweep on their site shows a pr; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00117.html (11,753 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]