Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Sept\s+contest\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: N3AWS@aol.com (N3AWS@aol.com)
Date: Mon Jul 28 18:39:11 2003
Hi Mike, Unfortunately I am working nights in September which will prevent me from doing a rover effort in FL. I will most likely be operating as a portable QRP, but if I'm really pressed for time, I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00221.html (6,462 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: k1whs@worldpath.net (DAVID C. OLEAN)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
Hi contesters, What is going on with HSMS and WSJT in regards to ARRL contesting rules. I guess it is OK, but I remember when the league would not count a 1296 eme QSO with WB6IOM and a G station yea
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00175.html (9,278 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
Interesting question. When was the ruling on the eme QSO made? I guess instead of asking what the ARRL thinks (which is better answered by making a phone call), I would be interested in knowing what
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00176.html (9,690 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: k7cw@yahoo.com (Paul Kiesel)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
I guess I don't have a problem with the use of different kinds of modes in VHF/UHF contests. As you say, the VHF world is different. I think a weak-signal 1296 QSO between W6 and G should count, even
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00179.html (11,752 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
I'm familiar with HSCW and WSJT but have personally not operated either mode. I look forward to trying both, from a technical and fun perspective. But, for contesting, I fall in the camp who believes
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00180.html (9,811 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: k1whs@worldpath.net (DAVID C. OLEAN)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
Hi Dave, The genesis for my original post was the WSJT mode, which apparently, is a step up from the normal high speed meteor scatter. Essentially all of the detection is done by the computer. The op
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00181.html (11,619 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: k8kfj@ntelos.net (Garie Halstead)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
Add another vote Dave. Copying contest exchanges in realtime using ones ears + grey matter is what it's all about IMHO. 73 //Gary *K8KFJ*
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00183.html (7,648 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: n0jk@hotmail.com (jon jones)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
N0JK EM18 QRP Portable I have to work some of the contest weekend... but plan to be QRV WX permitting from the "Cattle Pens" EM18 Saturday evening and Sunday evening. Bands 50, 144, 432 and 1296 MHz.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00184.html (7,966 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: w7xu@dtgnet.com (w7xu)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
Hello all, I must disagree with most of the comments that I've seen on this reflector regarding HSCW and WSJT in VHF contests. The use of HSCW (and in the future, WSJT) in the contests doesn't detrac
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00189.html (9,738 bytes)

10. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
Interesting question. When was the ruling on the eme QSO made? I guess instead of asking what the ARRL thinks (which is better answered by making a phone call), I would be interested in knowing what
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-09/msg00001.html (9,718 bytes)

11. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: k7cw@yahoo.com (Paul Kiesel)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
I guess I don't have a problem with the use of different kinds of modes in VHF/UHF contests. As you say, the VHF world is different. I think a weak-signal 1296 QSO between W6 and G should count, even
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-09/msg00002.html (11,736 bytes)

12. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: k1whs@worldpath.net (DAVID C. OLEAN)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
Hi contesters, What is going on with HSMS and WSJT in regards to ARRL contesting rules. I guess it is OK, but I remember when the league would not count a 1296 eme QSO with WB6IOM and a G station yea
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-09/msg00003.html (9,251 bytes)

13. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
I'm familiar with HSCW and WSJT but have personally not operated either mode. I look forward to trying both, from a technical and fun perspective. But, for contesting, I fall in the camp who believes
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-09/msg00006.html (9,878 bytes)

14. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: k1whs@worldpath.net (DAVID C. OLEAN)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
Hi Dave, The genesis for my original post was the WSJT mode, which apparently, is a step up from the normal high speed meteor scatter. Essentially all of the detection is done by the computer. The op
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-09/msg00008.html (11,642 bytes)

15. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: k8kfj@ntelos.net (Garie Halstead)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
Add another vote Dave. Copying contest exchanges in realtime using ones ears + grey matter is what it's all about IMHO. 73 //Gary *K8KFJ*
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-09/msg00012.html (7,676 bytes)

16. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: n0jk@hotmail.com (jon jones)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
N0JK EM18 QRP Portable I have to work some of the contest weekend... but plan to be QRV WX permitting from the "Cattle Pens" EM18 Saturday evening and Sunday evening. Bands 50, 144, 432 and 1296 MHz.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-09/msg00014.html (8,004 bytes)

17. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: w7xu@dtgnet.com (w7xu)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
Hello all, I must disagree with most of the comments that I've seen on this reflector regarding HSCW and WSJT in VHF contests. The use of HSCW (and in the future, WSJT) in the contests doesn't detrac
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-09/msg00020.html (9,754 bytes)

18. [VHFcontesting] Sept contest (score: 1)
Author: Hal Dale <wb4aeg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:04:36 -0400
WB4AEG, EM74 here during the contest. 50/144/222/432...GL/73 and try CW...much btr...Hal *CW.....When all else fails...* _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHF
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-09/msg00004.html (6,471 bytes)

19. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: Herb Krumich <wa2fgk@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
We will be ready to go this weekend I'm looking for skeds especially on 6 or 2 meters FSK scatter. I will be on 50-10ghz with decent equipment Please send me sked requests Thanks Herb at WA2FGK FN21
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-09/msg00011.html (7,414 bytes)

20. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Olean" <k1whs@metrocast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:56:37 -0400
Problems in FN43MJ! There will be no organized operation from K1WHS in the September Contest. A last minute emergency has curtailed our plans to be on in force. I had all bands up thru 10 GHz working
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-09/msg00013.html (9,318 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu