Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Solar\s+Flare\s+June\s+7\,\s+possible\s+magnetic\s+storm\s+June\s+9\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Solar\s+Flare\s+June\s+7\,\s+possible\s+magnetic\s+storm\s+June\s+9\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Solar Flare June 7, possible magnetic storm June 9 (score: 1): Author: DAVE CLEMONS <dave@egh.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:02:26 -0400; I am still relatively new to 6 and 2 meters, so I have no experience with the behavior of these bands during geomagnetic storms. Can someone enlighten me on how this event may affect this weekend's c; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-06/msg00044.html (7,551 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Solar Flare June 7, possible magnetic storm June 9 (score: 1): Author: "Eric Smith" <kb7dqh@donobi.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:03:42 -0700; If we get "radio aurora" then SSB will "sound funny" on 6 meters, and become completely unintelligible on 2 meters. Similarly, CW signals will sound noticeably "wobbly" and "rough" and as the ionizat; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-06/msg00049.html (9,057 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]