Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Solving\s+FT8\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Solving\s+FT8\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Solving FT8 (score: 1): Author: Herb Krumich via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 04:18:30 +0000 (UTC); Every year contester's complain about FT8 and the upper bands laying idol.I said this five years ago and it's getting old.As a matter of fact I sold my entire big time contest station, one piece at a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00081.html (7,643 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Solving FT8 (score: 1): Author: N2WM Walt <n2wm@centurylink.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 09:31:18 -0500; I have been doing VHF Contests since 1970 and I agree with Jeff AA6XA about too many Categores and Herb that the FT-8 issue needs action not words. Most stations I work either from home or a Hillto; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00086.html (9,200 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Solving FT8 (score: 1): Author: Gregory Winters <greg_winters@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:23:07 +0000; I do not support eliminating FT8 or moving to an all digital contest. Its not a problem to solve--because it is NOT a problem. What is happening is what was always going to happen. There will be new; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00115.html (12,212 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Solving FT8 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:48:39 -0600; FT8 split the RTTY list (which has been around since steam days) into two. The original list is dead and "rtty-digital" is not much better. Hint - more channels doesn't mean more good content. You'd; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00119.html (8,585 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]