Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Sports\s+vs\.\s+Radiosports\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 07:24:36 -0400
Be willing to think unconventionally for a moment... == Sports == Ten people crouch at the starting line. The referee's pistol is held in the air for a moment. The trigger is squeezed and the runners
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00020.html (8,869 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:47:24 -0500
Really? I must admit that I come from the HF contest world and many of the top stations have web sites - that provide all sorts of information about the station and it's design. In addition I have fo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00021.html (9,426 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 23:51:23 -0400
== Radio Contests Today == When it's all over, we are given 30-days to "audit our logs". Are you trying to imply that people are cheating during this period? Could you explain this to us a bit more?
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00023.html (7,586 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: Alex <kr1st@amsat.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 10:13:53 -0400
...and by location, location, location, if there's nothing else but LOS propagation. Down here near Charleston, SC it gets really lonely during a VHF contest when there are no openings. But I agree w
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00025.html (7,580 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: Alex <kr1st@amsat.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 10:41:30 -0400
Ev Tupis wrote: == Radio Contests Today == When it's all over, we are given 30-days to "audit our logs". Are you trying to imply that people are cheating during this period? Could you explain this to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00026.html (9,693 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: "kentke" <kentke@infoblvd.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 11:45:53 -0400
I have never seen as much bickering as goes on these days. Why don't you guys just get on the air and have some "FUN" making contacts. By the way, look for my friend and I (KA2LIM & KB2YCC) /4 the da
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00027.html (11,711 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 11:49:49 -0400
== Radio Contests Today == When it's all over, we are given 30-days to "audit our logs". Are you trying to imply that people are cheating during this period? Could you explain this to us a bit more?
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00028.html (10,763 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 12:02:18 -0400
...and by location, location, location, if there's nothing else but LOS propagation. Down here near Charleston, SC it gets really lonely during a VHF contest when there are no openings. Yes, indeed.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00029.html (9,129 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 13:41:00 -0400
kentke wrote: I have never seen as much bickering as goes on these days. Why don't you guys just get on the air and have some "FUN" making contacts. This list is called "VHFcontesting". That is what
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00030.html (8,215 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: Alex <kr1st@amsat.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 15:59:02 -0400
Phew! If you're concerned about how folks use a word, just don't use it and just say what you want to say, even if that takes a few more words. As you can see, quotation marks do not make things any
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00031.html (9,594 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: Dave Olean <k1whs@worldpath.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 16:17:50 -0400
Hi Alex, I think you are taking things too seriously. W2EV is just trying to get all of us to think without our usual blinders on. Yeah, some of it sounds crazy, but it is all creative, or showing so
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00032.html (10,339 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 15:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
Yepp, I'm with Dave on this one. I too find many of W2EV's various idea postings to be both thought provoking and interesting. I may even completely disagree with some of those ideas (remember the id
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00033.html (11,060 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: Alex <kr1st@amsat.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 20:02:16 -0400
Hi Dave, Dave Olean wrote: I think you are taking things too seriously. Do I? Ev provokes thought. I express my thoughts, and now I'm too serious. Ok. I'm not too familiar with this list, so I may ha
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00035.html (9,598 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: w3sz <w3sz@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 21:12:25 -0400
Hi, Guys [and Gals]! I just got back home from a day of the mundane [but still enjoyable] side of HR; making power cables, deciding where the computers will go, etc., and found this VERY interesting
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00037.html (10,286 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 08:43:20 -0500
I agree - the CW Sprint now has a log deadline of a week. The internet sprints have had log dealines of like 3 days. I would gladly go for faster log deadlines if this also means results sooner. -- G
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00038.html (9,572 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 08:45:56 -0500
While I do not know the exact numbers - there are very few paper logs submitted these days - and the numbers keep going down every year. The CW sprint shortened the log submission window to a week an
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00039.html (9,830 bytes)

17. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 08:48:03 -0500
This already happens by default in some contests - if you submit a paper log then it might be entered by hand into the computer by one of the log checkers - thus you run the risk they will introduce
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00040.html (9,223 bytes)

18. [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: "jon jones" <n0jk@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 14:59:40 +0000
Just a quick correction for the sake of proper credit... A 21st century Focus does not include hams who do not have means to electronically submit logs, or who choose to use paper logging? Let's keep
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00048.html (9,247 bytes)

19. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 21:41:12 -0500
The WRTC real-time scoe reporting was done by the referees at each contest station. They manually sent in their team's numbers as an SMS text message on a cell phone once an hour, which was automatic
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00054.html (11,769 bytes)

20. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 07:07:55 -0400
Having engendered some very thought provoking responses (and keep 'em coming!), my mind wandered to a new Radiosporting structure... Suppose the system allowed for two types of non-paper entries (pap
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00057.html (10,676 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu