Ken is right that WRTC "real-time" scoring is a much different situation with referees on site at each WRTC station as opposed to "home stations linked to some central server via the Internet." I bel
Ken is right that WRTC "real-time" scoring is a much different situation I hope I haven't misstated something along the way. I used WRTC2002 simply as an example of "out of the box" thinking only. Th
EV, out here in the heathen lands west of the Mississippi some of these ideas like HamIM are going to catch little traction for rovers & portable operators to even consider let alone embrace. I'm all
Ev Tupis wrote: Ken is right that WRTC "real-time" scoring is a much different situation I hope I haven't misstated something along the way. I used WRTC2002 simply as an example of "out of the box" t
So in your viewpoint, "always-on" Internet connectivity is a requirement to participate in such a real-time event? Not at all. It would simply be a requirement for those who wish to take advantage of
I would suggest that such a contest be kept near real-time for all participants who are competing for awards. As I suggested before I think that a once per hour log submission requirement would be ad
Would someone explain to me how this would encourage the casual on seldom contester to get on the air? I would contend that this does more to discourage than encourage participation in the contests.
I circulate this on a regular basis to remind people you don't have to spend half the national debt to have some fun. http://www.ka5cvh.com/vhf/contest.htm http://www.ka5cvh.com/vhf/index.htm -- Mike