- 1. [VHFcontesting] The Issue (2): R2R QSO's (score: 1)
- Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 07:39:01 -0500
- Contrasting against the approach in the previous note titled "The Issue (1): ...", and within the context of wanting to actually write a specific rule that makes a particular strategy unattractive...
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00202.html (8,404 bytes)
- 2. Re: [VHFcontesting] The Issue (2): R2R QSO's (score: 1)
- Author: "Dan Evans" <n9rla@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 10:46:18 -0500
- R2R I agree. Bob's, K0NR, idea is the most workable I've seen yet. With a time delay before re-entering a grid THAT ONLY APPLIES TO ROVER TO ROVER QSO's. This way, if I get to a grid corner, I can wo
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00204.html (8,620 bytes)
- 3. RE: [VHFcontesting] The Issue (2): R2R QSO's (score: 1)
- Author: "Buck Calabro" <Buck.Calabro@commsoft.net>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:37:07 -0500
- I maintain that writing rules to restrict contacts goes against the supposed goals of changing the rules. Here's an example: In each grid square, there are a small number (maybe only 1) of good hill
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-03/msg00009.html (8,079 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu