Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHF\+\s+Contesting\s+Rule\s+Changes\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] VHF+ Contesting Rule Changes (score: 1)
Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 23:42:55 -0600
With respect to the new categories, there's nothing particularly odd about the timing. The changes approved in January of 2014 (and publicly announced in board reports) have just taken a while to wor
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-01/msg00011.html (11,254 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF+ Contesting Rule Changes (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 07:31:48 -0700
Ward, Thanks for sharing this as it provides useful context. 73, Bob K0NR On 1/1/2015 10:42 PM, Ward Silver wrote: With respect to the new categories, there's nothing particularly odd about the timin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-01/msg00012.html (8,070 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] VHF+ Contesting Rule Changes (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 10:37:41 -0700
Thanks Ward for the clarification. To me, at least, this points out what a convoluted path ARRL contest rules changes and implementation take from inception to implementation. It is no wonder people
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-01/msg00013.html (8,569 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF+ Contesting Rule Changes (score: 1)
Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 12:24:38 -0600
I am not sure I would want to see the actual diagram...something about sausage being made :-) The current rules have grown incrementally over the years with the technology changing far faster than th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-01/msg00014.html (10,756 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF+ Contesting Rule Changes (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 11:57:49 -0700
Ward - I understand about sausage. :^)= I think that one of the major tasks for the Ad Hoc committee should be to consolidate all of the rules in one place. Included in that I hope would be clear def
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-01/msg00015.html (12,759 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF+ Contesting Rule Changes (score: 1)
Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 13:39:47 -0600
The ad-hoc committee is only charged with recommending new rules etc, not adminstration issues. I think HQ/PS&C/CAC is pretty much aware of the need to revamp the way in which the rules are presented
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-01/msg00016.html (14,634 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu