- 1. [VHFcontesting] VHF?? (score: 1)
- Author: Mitch Stern <w1sj@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:14:31 -0400
- Is this a VHF contest or activity? If it is a typical state QSO Party (primarily HF) it doesn't belong here. Please respect the group by not posting off-topic. Mitch _________________________________
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-09/msg00035.html (7,417 bytes)
- 2. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF?? (score: 1)
- Author: Jeffrey Embry <jeffrey.embry@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:45:27 -0400
- A quick look at the rules state that 6, 2, and higher may be used 73, Jeff K3OQ -- Jeff Embry, K3OQ FM19nb ARCI #11643, FPQRP #-696, QRP-L # 67, NAQCC #25, ARS #1733 AMSAT LM-2263 -- Success is the a
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-09/msg00036.html (8,177 bytes)
- 3. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF?? (score: 1)
- Author: Tad Danley <tdanley@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:22:26 -0500
- I've worked folks on 50 MHz in the PA and TX QSO Parties. Tad Danley, K3TD EM10dq If it is a typical state QSO Party (primarily HF) it doesn't belong here. Please respect the group by not posting off
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-09/msg00037.html (8,548 bytes)
- 4. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF?? (score: 1)
- Author: "Joshua M. Arritt" <jarritt@vt.edu>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:52:23 -0400
- Virginia QSO Party (in March) also counts V/U Qs..... - Josh / KF4YLM Tad Danley, K3TD EM10dq If it is a typical state QSO Party (primarily HF) it doesn't belong here. Please respect the group by not
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-09/msg00038.html (8,483 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu