Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHF\s+Contest\s+Changes\?\?\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Changes??? (score: 1)
Author: Dave Agsten <w4txs@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 17:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Let's throw this into the mix..................... Why does a "VHF" Contest include frequencies that are NOT VHF Frequencies? ie. anything above 300Mhz is not a VHF frequency. CQ's contest is at leas
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00112.html (7,403 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Changes??? (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 17:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
I dunno. Why do HF contests include 160 meters, which is actually an MF band? Then again, a train station is where a train stops. A bus station is where a bus stops. Here I sit at my work station, t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00113.html (7,321 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Changes??? (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 01:26:20 -0000
And why does the UHF contest involve a VHF band (222mhz), as well as frequencies above UHF (3.4g and up)? 73s John NE0P Frequencies? ie. anything above 300Mhz is not a VHF frequency. on target would
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00114.html (8,389 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Changes??? (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 01:27:17 -0000
And maybe we can get the ARRL to add 15 meters to the 10 meter contest. 73s John NE0P _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00115.html (9,019 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Changes??? (score: 1)
Author: Dan_K9ZF <n9rla@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:35:57 -0400
Actually, I've often thought it would be nice to have 10 added to VHF contests :-) No good reason really, 10 is just one of my favorite bands! 73 Dan -- K9ZF /R no budget Rover **QRP-l #1269 Check ou
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00116.html (7,619 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Changes??? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 20:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
The top end of 10 meters is only 300 kHz from being VHF! K7CW http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spa
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00117.html (8,682 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Changes??? (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 04:25:28 -0000
And you we also realize that for the 2.3g band one segment is 2300 to 2310mhz. The other segment is 2390 to 2450mhz. Those segments are 80mhz apart, but considered 1 band. That gap is larger than the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00118.html (9,718 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Changes??? (score: 1)
Author: "Stephan F Andre" <andres@msu.edu>
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 23:23:41 -0400
One plausible explaination would be that the "UHF" contest is really something to do that isn't 2M. Adding 220 into the mix gives 220 some extra exposure, which is a good thing. Likewise, 1296 really
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00122.html (9,827 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu