Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHF\s+Contest\s+Rules\s+Revisions\s+\-\s+Part\s+III\s*$/: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

21. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: k1whs@worldpath.net (David Olean)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:46 2003
with nil with published. the populated rare up rare under score. in all stations Maybe a the us fun may a an It supporting I from take Instead stabilized started, not.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02208.html (17,440 bytes)

22. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: kb1eaa@berkshire.rr.com (Dave Wendling)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:46 2003
How can you call CQ and not answer when someone comes back? Be specific or don't call CQ. You're one of those guys I wasted lot's of precious time on. KB1EAA, Dave
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02217.html (9,682 bytes)

23. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: kb1eaa@berkshire.rr.com (Dave Wendling)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:46 2003
You haven't been out much. I have been in my rover parked next to captive rovers on Mt Wachussets in MA who would not give me a point even after I walked over and introduced myself to them! I also pe
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02218.html (10,113 bytes)

24. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: callbill@hotmail.com (Bill Olson)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:46 2003
Dave, If you say it's true it's true. And actually i'm sure it is true in some cases. That has not been my experience. But I say it doesn't matter and I HAVE been out there a LOT! You can't make a ru
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02221.html (10,748 bytes)

25. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:46 2003
We already have rules that limit who you can work - ie. you can only work your own operators on 2.4 and up, you can only work them if they each have seperate stations and those have to be capable of
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02223.html (9,951 bytes)

26. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:46 2003
I have mixed feelings about this - as I often work quite a few uniques in the ARRL November SSB Sweepstakes. I spend time talking guys through the exchange - some only work me - others go on to work
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02225.html (9,994 bytes)

27. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:46 2003
Hey, why not arm the locals with 222 MHz too? There hasn't been any microwave activity in this immediate area except for me and the occasional rover that comes through. I've actually been working on
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02226.html (9,402 bytes)

28. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: johngeig@yahoo.com (John Geiger)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:46 2003
You had better make sure that he works someone else, or you might be tossed out of the contest for "not playing fair" 73s John NE0P http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting ________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02227.html (10,431 bytes)

29. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: W2fca@cs.com (W2fca@cs.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:46 2003
You're not missing anything. It helps the station win. Frank W2FCA
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02229.html (8,513 bytes)

30. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: j.a.hermans@skynet.be (j.a.hermans)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:46 2003
Hello contestants, My broad view from Europe. I found the following defintion for " Contest "; A competition to do better than other people, usually in which prizes are given...... So, a logic behavi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02231.html (9,838 bytes)

31. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: kb1eaa@berkshire.rr.com (Dave Wendling)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:47 2003
How about we only count the points of operators who send in a log. This way the local manufactured points of guys who never send in logs would not count AND we could easily spot captive rovers......
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02239.html (10,062 bytes)

32. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: bdh@teleport.com (Bruce Herrick)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:47 2003
way count How about we ignore all these non-problems and get on with the business of having fun? Bruce WW1M
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02240.html (9,626 bytes)

33. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: kb1eaa@berkshire.rr.com (Dave Wendling)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:47 2003
You don't think ideas are fun? I would like to see only points awarded for logs submitted. It was just a thought, nothing to get your old knickers in a twist over... KB1EAA, Dave
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02241.html (10,106 bytes)

34. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: jim@forsyth.net (Jim Forsyth)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:47 2003
way count Or we could just cancel the contest altogether, is that where you are headed? Jim, AF6O
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02242.html (9,880 bytes)

35. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: W2fca@cs.com (W2fca@cs.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:47 2003
It wouldn't be that hard to find the captive rovers by examining the logs. The big problem with only counting the points of operators who send in a log is that there are a number of reasons why someb
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02243.html (8,868 bytes)

36. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: kb1eaa@berkshire.rr.com (Dave Wendling)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:47 2003
not logs. log S&P new I just think it would help keep everybody honest. If you want to play then send in a log. This way all points could be verified. It would eliminate some of the problems with un
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02244.html (9,512 bytes)

37. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: johngeig@yahoo.com (John Geiger)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:47 2003
Amen! How about we leave everything the way it is since it is not broken. If you don't like finishing in second place, or whatever, get your own captive rovers. At least it will increase activity on
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02245.html (10,595 bytes)

38. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: kb1eaa@berkshire.rr.com (Dave Wendling)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:47 2003
Yeah Jim, That's right where I'm heading. Why don't you head that way first and see if the coast is clear......Geeezzz! KB1EAA, Dave
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02246.html (9,970 bytes)

39. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III (score: 1)
Author: jim@forsyth.net (Jim Forsyth)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:47 2003
first Because I actually like the contest. Jim
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02247.html (9,880 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu