Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHFcontesting\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+229\,\s+Issue\s+15\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHFcontesting\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+229\,\s+Issue\s+15\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 229, Issue 15 (score: 1): Author: Ben S <bschudel2@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:36:27 -0600; FT8 is great for making a few contacts or grabbing those hard to hit stations. I do think there is a self perpetuating fear of missing contacts that to some degree causes operators to stay on FT8 lon; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-01/msg00048.html (17,649 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 229, Issue 15 (score: 1): Author: <k9mk@flash.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:00:38 -0700; As a counterpoint, the fear of missing a station prevails on any mode. One draw with FT-x is you know where to look and that "channel" is QRM tolerant compared to a hand full of big guns on SSB calli; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-01/msg00049.html (20,411 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 229, Issue 15 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Holmes" <tholmes@woh.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:43:17 -0500; Every contest for the last three years I've heard the same gripes from pretty much the same folks about the awful, contest-killing effect of FT-8 on contesting. It's getting a bit old and frankly has; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-01/msg00050.html (21,704 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]