Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+What\s+about\s+me\?\s+I\s+am\s+captive\.\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Ertl (KE3HT)" <ke3ht@ke3ht.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 01:09:20 -0400
What is a captive rover? I gather this from discussion on this list: I schedule ahead of the contest with only two or three stations. My June logs (available on my web site) will show that I mainly w
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00279.html (9,625 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: w3sz <w3sz@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 03:00:12 -0400
HI, Tim, I think that you are a great rover and greatly appreciate the favor you do for all of us in the VHF and up community with your hard work and great roving skills! I think it is a tiny very vo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00280.html (15,605 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 04:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
Tim, your operation is "what it's all about" for the 90% of the participants who won't submit scores in the "Top 10 percent". :) We find things about the contest that keep us coming back. You have...
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00282.html (9,546 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 05:33:45 -0700
Tim, Just keep doing what you are doing and don't let the vocal minority have any impact on your contesting enjoyment. Jim, AF6O Tell me, what should I do? Already one Rover has put his Rover up for
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00283.html (7,889 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <W5OV@W5OV.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:53:32 -0500
I am getting very tired of this discussion too, but I'm tired of the lack of understanding of and continued denial of what the problem is. The problem is that these captive rovers are in fact part of
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00284.html (10,959 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 06:27:19 -0700
To help out us dummies that aren't as bright as you are please name a couple of these captive rovers that fit your understanding so that we may better grasp "what the problem is". Jim, AF6O _________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00286.html (8,122 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: "John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK" <k9jk73@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:38:05 -0500
Primarily for Tim, I second what Jim and Ev have written. You are NOT a captive rover...the 'captivated' adjective (which I think Ev coined) fits you much better. AND...if you are having FUN...then k
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00287.html (9,580 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:20:06 -0500 (CDT)
I have nothing against Rovers whatsoever. I say "Welcome and go to it no matter what your strategy". I'll always try to work you if I can hear you. If I call and you don't answer, I can only assume y
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00289.html (9,074 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:34:25 -0500 (CDT)
And I am a captivated contester, as most of us are. (Couldn't resist!) Maybe that's why I'm a captivated contester. :-) 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mai
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00290.html (8,581 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:24:09 -0400
That's almost me. I can't get through to hardly anybody else, so I make sure I talk to a super contest station. My other option is to make QSOs with a super rover who can find me AND who has a micro
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00296.html (9,769 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:35:40 -0700
If captive rovers are "mythical" then explain why the ARRL's recent Ad-Hoc VHF/UHF Study Committee was tasked with (among other things) "Strengthen the rules to minimize the rover practices known as
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00297.html (12,035 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:40:10 -0700
An important point - most, if not all, of the rovers who are on microwave are also on VHF. In most places in the country, it is pretty easy to work a handful of stations on 144.200 with a modest set
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00298.html (10,260 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Page" <vhf@dave-page.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:00:09 -0400
Bob: Precisely. Let us fix that. A station 'operator' is a licensed amateur who keys a station transmitter in amateur service. No one is asserting that captive rovers are main station ops (on, say 22
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00301.html (13,483 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:52:47 -0500
In response to KD3NC (a past operator at W2SZ): First, you don't know me. I am neither lazy, nor a whiner. My motivation is to seek to get the rules changed to correctly address the issues at hand -
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00304.html (9,515 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Page" <vhf@dave-page.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:19:21 -0400
Bob: My position is my own and not at all representative of W2SZ's operators or crew. Clearly that was not the intent of your previous post, as you quoted the existing rules, to wit: "They violate th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00307.html (13,292 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:08:53 -0500
operators or crew. < Dave, My noting of your association with W2SZ was not to imply that you represented them, but rather to show that you are biased in this discussion. If you choose to continue to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00308.html (8,963 bytes)

17. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
-- "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com> wrote: After quoting most of this: http://www.yccc.org/Articles/VHF_UHF.pdf What is mythical is that their operation is somehow against the rules. No
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00309.html (10,125 bytes)

18. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:21:07 -0600
Tim Ertl (KE3HT) wrote: What is a captive rover? I gather this from discussion on this list: I schedule ahead of the contest with only two or three stations. My June logs (available on my web site) w
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00311.html (11,304 bytes)

19. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: "frank bechdoldt" <k3uhf@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:32:09 -0700
Unlesr the tax rules change lets celibrate the rich's ackomplishments of finding or making loopholes too. _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@cont
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00312.html (10,455 bytes)

20. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Katt <alienmenace@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:18:33 -0400
Sir, and others of your unfortunate opinions, It would be appreciated if you would stop badmouthing W2SZ. It is perhaps worth mentioning, for those who may not know, that W2SZ is a callsign granted t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00314.html (14,976 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu