Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Why\s+we\s+participate\s+\[was\:REMINDER\:\.\.\.CU2QSOPioneers\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Why\s+we\s+participate\s+\[was\:REMINDER\:\.\.\.CU2QSOPioneers\]\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Why we participate [was:REMINDER:...CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1): Author: Buck.Calabro@commsoft.net (Buck Calabro); Date: Thu Jul 24 11:38:27 2003; Hi! I am a relatively new Ham, and my home situation is such that I have no place to put antennas, so I operate mobile. When I found out about contesting, Rover seemed like a great fit. I have held; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00163.html (10,652 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Why we participate [was:REMINDER:...CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1): Author: windev@inetmarket.com (Gerry Hull); Date: Thu Jul 24 12:26:41 2003; CU2QSO is not going to impact who is in the top ten. In fact, I'll bet you'll never see a complaint about "So and so made the top ten because they used CU2QSO." A competitor who makes 100 rover QSOs; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00164.html (9,046 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Why we participate [was:REMINDER:...CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree); Date: Thu Jul 24 13:04:21 2003; Not sure I agree with this. In the June 2002 contest, I came in second in my division behind N7AU. He paid better attention to tracker rovers than I did, and as a result, had a better multiplier. Tha; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00166.html (8,878 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] Why we participate [was:REMINDER:...CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com (N3AWS@aol.com); Date: Thu Jul 24 19:59:52 2003; Hi BUck! You're comments are right on! 73, Jim N3AWS; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00171.html (7,860 bytes)
5. [VHFcontesting] Why we participate [was:REMINDER:...CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com (N3AWS@aol.com); Date: Thu Jul 24 20:01:34 2003; AMEN N3AWS; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00172.html (7,828 bytes)
6. [VHFcontesting] Why we participate [was:REMINDER:...CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1): Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV)); Date: Thu Jul 24 22:52:16 2003; What aspect of CU2QSO would you "control"? This thread must break out of the connection that you keep making with associating CU2QSO with packet spotting. After the ARRL Contest Desk actually took th; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00175.html (11,085 bytes)
7. [VHFcontesting] Why we participate [was:REMINDER:...CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree); Date: Fri Jul 25 00:42:55 2003; I am not trying to control an aspect of CU2QSO. I am referring to rules that limit what you can and can't do during a contest and still be called a single-operator - unassisted. Actually, maybe that; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00179.html (11,949 bytes)
8. [VHFcontesting] Why we participate [was:REMINDER:...CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1): Author: kc4atu@yahoo.com (Bill - KC4ATU); Date: Fri Jul 25 06:50:27 2003; Ok, I went to the web site. In the first couple of paragraphs there is the reference of using it to "chart the band conditions in real time." I have done that for years with the use of the beacons. W; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00183.html (9,670 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]