Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+ic\s+746\s+vs\s+920\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+ic\s+746\s+vs\s+920\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] ic 746 vs 920 (score: 1): Author: "frank bechdoldt" <k3uhf@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:12:49 -0800; I would pick the ft 920 over the ic 746, I have had both. Though the 746 does 2 meters the ft 920 hears better is easyir to opperate and rejects more noise than the 746. However if you have nothing e; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00080.html (6,830 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] ic 746 vs 920 (score: 1): Author: "Joshua M. Arritt" <jarritt@vt.edu>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:39:48 -0400; While it's a very capable rig, the FT-847 left a nasty taste in my mouth when it came to 6 meter contest performance. LOTS of debilitating side splatter didn't show up on the TS-690S we had on hand a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00085.html (8,424 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]