Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+ic\s+746\s+vs\s+920\s+vs\s+FT\-847\s+et\s+al\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+ic\s+746\s+vs\s+920\s+vs\s+FT\-847\s+et\s+al\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] ic 746 vs 920 vs FT-847 et al (score: 1): Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:15:16 -0500; All: An interesting mix of radios under discussion. Since I have experience with all of them, let me add my $.02. My only experience with the FT-920 came on HF down at WP2Z where we endured a CQ WPX; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00086.html (11,737 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] ic 746 vs 920 vs FT-847 et al (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:51:27 -0700 (PDT); But, if I understand the INRAD page correctly, it still really isn't cascaded filters. The signal goes through 2 filters, but they are both at the same IF, correct? I thought that cascading filters m; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00087.html (7,940 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]