Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+impedence\s+of\s+8\"\s+long\s+bulkhead\s+\@\s+VHF\/UHF\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] impedence of 8" long bulkhead @ VHF/UHF? (score: 1)
Author: <k8bb@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:13:43 -0000
Hello, I have searched the archives for this, but I do not see an answer. My Question: What is the reason that I show *very weird* SWR curves at VHF/UHF when feeding through UHF bulkhead connectors t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00000.html (8,583 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] impedence of 8" long bulkhead @ VHF/UHF? (score: 1)
Author: "crawfish" <crawfish@surfmore.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:50:57 -0600
My feelings are that the "Not Exactly 9913" is your problem. See if you can get some LMR-400 and sub for it. Joe W4AAB -- Original Message -- From: <k8bb@comcast.net> To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.co
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00001.html (9,974 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] impedence of 8" long bulkhead @ VHF/UHF? (score: 1)
Author: Robert Cumming <w2bzy@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 19:28:46 -0500
Don There are all kinds of "bulkhead" UHF connectors. I've used the Short variety (83-1F) made by Amphenol with good results up to 2M but I've heard nothing but horror stories about the longer variet
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00003.html (14,700 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] impedence of 8" long bulkhead @ VHF/UHF? (score: 1)
Author: Fred Lass <felasstic@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 16:22:58 -0800 (PST)
UHF connectors are not 50 ohms. In cases where the length is small in terms of wavelengths the error is not significant. Hence a single connector won't matter, but the long bulkhead is too long. The
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00004.html (11,154 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] impedence of 8" long bulkhead @ VHF/UHF? (score: 1)
Author: <k2kw-8@adelphia.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 16:46:29 -0800
I have even seen SWR changes and velocity factor changes at HF with non-Amphenol short barrel connectors, PL259's, T-connectors, and push-on PL259 connectors. I've made a lot of coax stubs for HF con
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00006.html (10,746 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] impedence of 8" long bulkhead @ VHF/UHF? (score: 1)
Author: <k8bb@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:01:17 -0000
Well, here is the conclusion: The bulkhead connector(s) I am using are causing the SWR problems at VHF and UHF. While visiting his QTH this past weekend, Tim Duffy, K3LR, was kind enough to check an
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00027.html (12,473 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] impedence of 8" long bulkhead @ VHF/UHF? (score: 1)
Author: "wbr/wf4r" <wbr@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:49:15 -0500
Verrry intresting! Tnx fer de feed back. Glad you were able to find the problem. 73, Bill, WF4R _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00028.html (14,063 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] impedence of 8" long bulkhead @ VHF/UHF? (score: 1)
Author: <k2kw-8@adelphia.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:19:20 -0800
Any speculation on the cause of the SWR problems? Could the metal used be a problem? E.g. stainless steel is used in many antennas (and touted for it's strength), but it's a horrible conductor and is
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00029.html (13,557 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] impedence of 8" long bulkhead @ VHF/UHF? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:00:12 -0500
I am certain that if you measure the outside diameter of the rod, the inside diameter of the body and calculate the impedance of the resulting transmission line it WILL NOT be 50 ohms. UHF (misnomer)
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00030.html (15,891 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] impedence of 8" long bulkhead @ VHF/UHF? (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:26:49 -0600
the swr problem is due the fact that these connectors are not made to be 50 ohms at vhf frequency's.. I would think that the center tube is too big of a diameter.. but i don't know much about these t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00031.html (15,978 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu