Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+my\s+take\s+on\s+VHF\s+contests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+my\s+take\s+on\s+VHF\s+contests\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] my take on VHF contests (score: 1): Author: Ralph Matheny K8RYU <mathenyr@marietta.edu>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 15:52:36 -0500 (EST); 1. There is nothing much more boring than a VHF contest. 2. There is no way to make those in low-population areas competitive with those in cities. 3. The present setup makes both of the problems WOR; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-02/msg00086.html (8,359 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] my take on VHF contests (score: 1): Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:10:08 -0500; I agree with that statement about "running the bands". It is kind of an accepted procedure. Changing it would be difficult. Buddy WB4OMG In a message dated 2/23/2015 3:52:58 P.M. Eastern Standard Tim; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-02/msg00088.html (7,220 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] my take on VHF contests (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc@fidmail.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:12:59 -0600; One solution might be to tell the "run the band request" that you will meet him in 5 minutes or so, and work down the pileup first. If you had a separate 2m rig you could work between the 2 in SO2R s; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-02/msg00089.html (8,622 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] my take on VHF contests (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:13:35 -0600; I like to run the bands with a couple other stations, but we havwe an agreed-upon rule that we won't do it if there's a pileup or a big opening on 50 or 144 MHz. We usually schedule a time several ho; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-02/msg00090.html (8,234 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]