- 1. [VHFcontesting] psyched out (score: 1)
- Author: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:49:52 -0800
- A snip from paul, A guy I really do like, becuase he usually makes me think. "A solution for achieving high esteem: If you find that you probably won't win, Drop back and consider just having fun by
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00210.html (8,119 bytes)
- 2. Re: [VHFcontesting] psyched out (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:08:20 -0800 (PST)
- Frank, You didn't have to take that quote out of context, but it still applies. Your other enhancement didn't help you, either. In an indirect way, I addressed the "situation" in California. But, sin
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00212.html (10,428 bytes)
- 3. Re: [VHFcontesting] psyched out (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:24:31 -0500
- Hi Paul Can you help me to understand why you think the work load would increase on the sponsors for distance scoring? I didn't think we are actually talking about a new set of rules only the way the
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00213.html (12,961 bytes)
- 4. Re: [VHFcontesting] psyched out (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:26:26 -0800 (PST)
- Hi Ron, Perhaps I shouldn't have said "large". Of course, nothing has been settled as to rules, but the general feeling out there is that 6-character grids would be used for the report. If that were
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00215.html (14,242 bytes)
- 5. Re: [VHFcontesting] psyched out (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:26:07 -0500
- Hi Paul Thanks for the follow up. I agree that passing the 6 digit grid during the exchange might not be attractive to many operators including myself on some bands. On 902 mhz and up to 2.3 ghz I ru
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00219.html (18,215 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu