- 1. [VHFcontesting] rover antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "frank bechdoldt" <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:56:18 -0700
- Ok here's one I'm qualified to talk about for sure. See my call on QRZ... Anyway, the cushcraft 3 bander 6/2/432 have the antennas on a seperate plane. IE 2 and 432 on one plane and 6 on the other. Y
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00035.html (9,490 bytes)
- 2. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover antennas (score: 1)
- Author: Dan_K9ZF <n9rla@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:06:03 -0400
- I have to agree with Frank, I like to have big antennas for the Rover. I guess it depends on your "audience". If you are planning to Rove through urban areas with most of your contacts at short range
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00047.html (8,108 bytes)
- 3. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover antennas (score: 1)
- Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:13:58 -0600
- Amen, pass the Tylenol. :-) Unless you're doing microwaves, then mount the transverter as close to the dish as possible. :-) Nate WY0X _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting ma
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00048.html (7,991 bytes)
- 4. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover antennas (score: 1)
- Author: Dan_K9ZF <n9rla@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 18:47:22 -0400
- I usually run 11.5 to 12 feet above ground level with no problems. After awhile, you learn to watch for tree limbs. It gets to be a habit even when you aren't in the rover:-) You do have to watch for
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00129.html (7,536 bytes)
- 5. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "JT Croteau" <jt.n1ese@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:02:01 -0400
- It's already habit for me as my HF whip for 40M is around 12' already. That brings up an interesting question. Can we be held liable if a rover yanks down a low hanging cable or phone line or is it t
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00130.html (8,025 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu