- 1. [VHFcontesting] rover__ Jim and Duffy's posts. (score: 1)
- Author: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:47:43 -0700
- John wrote: I have learned from the (endless) discussion of rover rules on the reflector that you are not supposed to enter a contest unless you have an expectation of winning it. Im not sure what le
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00144.html (9,121 bytes)
- 2. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover__ Jim and Duffy's posts. (score: 1)
- Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
- But that never happens in any contest. As I said before, many people are putting more operating time in than I am, and the rules don't account for that. Some have much bigger stations that I have, so
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00156.html (8,366 bytes)
- 3. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover__ Jim and Duffy's posts. (score: 1)
- Author: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:04:16 -0700
- Well what you are talking about seems much more of a stretch than seperating a band of 10 station workng together in unison to inflate their score and those who do not do this. It simple just put the
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00163.html (9,857 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu