Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+transverters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+transverters\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] transverters (score: 1): Author: Marten T Beels <martentb@goshen.edu>; Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:07:11 -0500; Hello, after completing the recent Sept VHF QSO, I'm looking forward to participating in the next one and hopefully adding more bands. I have a 2m to 6m transverter that seems to work really well, an; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-09/msg00122.html (7,190 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] transverters (score: 1): Author: Marten T Beels <martentb@goshen.edu>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:57:23 -0500; Thanks for the informative replies on adding transverters to our rover setup. I'll be checking out those articles and sources and seeing what the rover budget allows. Marten -- This mail sent through; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-09/msg00127.html (7,162 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] transverters (score: 1): Author: Marten T Beels <martentb@goshen.edu>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:12:12 -0500; At the request of a list member, I'm submitting the responses to the list that I received on my request for information on transverters for 222. Good info should be shared! <quote> Hey Marten, Look f; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-09/msg00128.html (8,622 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] transverters (score: 1): Author: Gene Gabry <gene_n9tf@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:00:03 -0800 (PST); Doing just a quick on line price check, the Elecraft XV222 is $369.00 as a kit, the DEMI as a kit is $295 and $395.00 fully assembled. I chose to spend the additional $26.00 for a pre assembled DEMI.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00035.html (7,835 bytes)
5. [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: Russ Hines <russ@wb8zcc.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:25:58 -0400; Hello all: I'm getting back into VHF/UHF contesting and wanted to know what you all thought about the best transverters available today. Last time I was involved ion this area, Microwave Modules was; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-07/msg00015.html (7,208 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:34:14 -0500; Hi Russ, If you're looking to build something from a kit or buy something already assembled, Down East Microwave is probably your best choice. I've built all of mine from scratch from various designs; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-07/msg00016.html (8,550 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: Lloyd Berg N9LB <lloydberg@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:06:35 -0400 (EDT); Hi Russ! I have the new version Down East Microwave transverters for 144, 222, 432, 902/903, and 1296 MHz. Very sensitive/low noise, decent filtering & LO stability, coming option for 10 MHz LO lock.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-07/msg00018.html (8,410 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: Russ Hines <russ@wb8zcc.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:50:06 -0400; Well, I'm starting from nearly a dead stop, so I'm interested in pretty much every band above 50MHz (the Flex-1500 already covers 6m). ;-) I have a 4el 6m Yagi on top of a pole at a whopping 20ft. AG; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-07/msg00019.html (9,443 bytes)
9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:44:02 -0400; I personally like the DEMI transverters. They are easy to work on and you can always get quick support from Steve and Sandra if need be. I just received the new 2 and 432 units, very nice, and have a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-07/msg00020.html (10,709 bytes)
10. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:43:12 -0500; Russ, if you like to build things, the W1GHZ transverters for 902 and 1296 perform quite well. His prices for the boards are very reasonable. Also, his transverters for 2304 and 3456 MHz probably wor; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-07/msg00021.html (11,310 bytes)
11. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: Jim Reese <jim@hosemore.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 19:32:19 -0500; I'll second Zack's recommendation on the W1GHZ transverter. I built the 902 version and it works great. I used the DEMI transverter controller board and sequencer. It was an easy construction project; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-07/msg00022.html (8,312 bytes)
12. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: Roger Thawley <roger.thawley@sky.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:11:40 +0100; Microwave Modules, now there's a blast from the past - they were based about 30 miles from where I live. If you plan to home-brew then see here for a high performance 2M transverter, schematics, PCB; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-07/msg00024.html (9,528 bytes)
13. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:20:25 -0500; That looks like a very nice homebrew transverter. The thing about DB6NT equipment is it is so expensive. DEMI is more of a middle ground for prices. It's generally far less expensive to build it your; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-07/msg00027.html (11,375 bytes)
14. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: DK5EW <dk5ew@mmmonvhf.de>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:54:37 +0200; Russ, there are also nice transverters by HA1YA http://ha1ya.config.hu/ They have outstanding technical data's and I can confirm that my 144MHz version is working perfect in 2m EME and contesting. Al; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-07/msg00030.html (9,082 bytes)
15. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: Roger Thawley <roger.thawley@sky.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:22:15 +0100; I believe DB6NT sells transverter cases (just like those he uses for his pre-built models) for anyone going down the home-brew route. Roger, G0BSU That looks like a very nice homebrew transverter. Th; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-07/msg00036.html (12,386 bytes)
16. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: Bill Olson <callbill@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 19:03:55 +0000; Hi all, Here's my take on all this. The nice thing about transverters, especially ones with high dynamic range mixers, is that they preserve the good features of the IF rig. If the IF rig is an HF tr; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-12/msg00020.html (17,291 bytes)
17. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:37:22 -0800; Bill nice post and you have more or less summed up my current thoughts re roving and transvetrers. I'll just mention that in my experience I have found it is helpful to have radios dedicated to 50 (a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-12/msg00021.html (13,361 bytes)
18. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (score: 1): Author: Sean Waite <waisean@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:43:16 -0500; I certainly wouldn't consider the older Yaesus or the HTX100 that we were running to be good IF radios, but they were certainly functional and inexpensive enough that we got on the bands. Another adv; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-12/msg00022.html (19,005 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]