Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+why\s+6\s+and\s+2\s+meters\s+only\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+why\s+6\s+and\s+2\s+meters\s+only\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] why 6 and 2 meters only? (score: 1): Author: Tad Danley <tdanley@suddenlink.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:45:03 -0500; I like the idea because it is easy to attract folks who may not have experience contesting. For most parts of the country, 6 and 2 meters will provide the best chance for 'random' QSOs even with mode; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00183.html (9,158 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] why 6 and 2 meters only? (score: 1): Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:21:12 -0500; The past several years I haven't had the opportunity to do much contesting and less roving. That does not mean that I've lost my heart for it. I try to encourage "newbies" to get on the air with mode; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00185.html (9,486 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] why 6 and 2 meters only? (score: 1): Author: "Ellen Rugowski" <ellenjoanne2003@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:44:23 -0500; That's all I have for 2m at the moment - a 2m HT, and a 30W brick. Ellen - AF9J 3:30 PM _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00186.html (10,379 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]