Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WL\-USERS\]\s+CW\/PTT\/FSK\s+Interface\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WL-USERS] CW/PTT/FSK Interface (score: 1)
Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner)
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 15:34:49 +0000
Eric - I just built a CW/FSK (which includes PTT) interface from a COM port. WL does not support FSK from an LPT port. I used the optos, but for some reason it wouldn't key the FSK circuit in my FT-1
/archives//html/WriteLog/1999-03/msg00015.html (8,089 bytes)

2. [WL-USERS] CW/PTT/FSK Interface (score: 1)
Author: n1rct@megalink.net (Dick, N1RCT)
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 12:41:55
Eric, I've added the circuit to my simple-transistor RTTY PTT/FSK article on: http://www.megalink.net/~n1rct/rit2/pttfsk.html It's a minor addition to get CW from writelog .. 73 de dick .............
/archives//html/WriteLog/1999-03/msg00016.html (8,000 bytes)

3. [WL-USERS] CW/PTT/FSK Interface (score: 1)
Author: Rosenberg.Eric@orbcomm.com (Rosenberg.Eric@orbcomm.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 11:14:59 -0500
Has anyone built a 3-in-one interface (PTT, CW, FSK) for WL or the other contest programs using a single serial port? I've been having problems with my parallel port optoisolated CW/PTT interface (RF
/archives//html/WriteLog/1999-03/msg00017.html (7,183 bytes)

4. [WL-USERS] CW/PTT/FSK Interface (score: 1)
Author: Rosenberg.Eric@orbcomm.com (Rosenberg.Eric@orbcomm.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 15:32:41 -0500
Dick -- your interface shows the CW and PTT as being the same interface (i.e., the same pins) from the serial port. Using the parallel port, I had separate outputs for CW and PTT. To assert PTT on th
/archives//html/WriteLog/1999-03/msg00018.html (9,860 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu