Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WL\-USERS\]\s+Node\s+filtering\s+vs\s+Software\s+filtering\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WL\-USERS\]\s+Node\s+filtering\s+vs\s+Software\s+filtering\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WL-USERS] Node filtering vs Software filtering (score: 1): Author: w9ol@dataflo.net (Bill); Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 22:26:21 -0500; A few people responded to my suggestion of node filtering. I'll try to explain my reasoning a bit further. Maybe the sysop who wrote will correct me if I'm wrong. Filtering at the node level before a; /archives//html/WriteLog/1999-06/msg00037.html (8,139 bytes)
2. [WL-USERS] Node filtering vs Software filtering (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 11:39:31 -0000; Bill - I think you hit the nail on the head! Problem is the packet sysops and those within a stone's throw of a node have no idea about the disconnects during a contest. I, being abt 25 miles from th; /archives//html/WriteLog/1999-06/msg00038.html (9,154 bytes)
3. [WL-USERS] Node filtering vs Software filtering (score: 1): Author: Alan.Maenchen@smi.siemens.com (Maenchen Alan (ITC)); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 09:34:28 -0700; Bill, You are right! I've never used the cluster filter before (mainly because of my own ignorance of how to use it) I'll try it out and activate it in the next contest. This is a better solution. 73; /archives//html/WriteLog/1999-06/msg00039.html (8,782 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]