Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+\"double\s+numbers\"\s+and\s+out\-of\-sequence\s+problems\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+\"double\s+numbers\"\s+and\s+out\-of\-sequence\s+problems\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] "double numbers" and out-of-sequence problems (score: 1): Author: w5xd@writelog.com (W. Wright, W5XD); Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 03:01:17 -0000; The short answer is: no, it has not been corrected, and in addition, I am not working on anything to change WL's current behavior. I am sure that's not a very satisfying answer, so here is more expla; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-01/msg00302.html (10,521 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] "double numbers" and out-of-sequence problems (score: 1): Author: Marty Tippin" <martyt@pobox.com (Marty Tippin); Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 21:40:11 -0600; As I have mentioned to Wayne privately before, I don't think the issue of gaps in serial numbers, or out-of-order QSOs in the log is nearly as much of a problem as DUPLICATE SERIAL NUMBERS. I'll vent; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-01/msg00303.html (14,012 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] "double numbers" and out-of-sequence problems (score: 1): Author: dj7aa-wil@t-online.de (ww); Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 07:22:15 +0100; This is NOT !! correct. We found a few times in a Multit single enviroment that writelog sends out (example 599-005 on radio a, and 599-006 on radio b) but logs both contacts with the same number. S; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-01/msg00306.html (8,790 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] "double numbers" and out-of-sequence problems (score: 1): Author: k5zd@ma.ultranet.com (Randy Thompson, K5ZD); Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 12:43:11 -0000; Actually, this is not true for ARRL and CQ contests. Since the Cabrillo log file format includes both the received and SENT information, the log checking software just matches up what was actually se; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-01/msg00309.html (9,615 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] "double numbers" and out-of-sequence problems (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 12:45:21 -0000; 73, Barry -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA FRC alternate: barry@w2up.wells.com -- WWW: http://www.writelog.com/ Submissions: writelog@contesting.com Administrative requ; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-01/msg00310.html (8,668 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] "double numbers" and out-of-sequence problems (score: 1): Author: w5xd@writelog.com (W. Wright, W5XD); Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:43:13 -0000; I STRONGLY dispute this claim that WL fails to log the serial number as sent. ...but I am thoughtfully considering all the accurate comments that have been submitted. Wayne, W5XD --Original Message--; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-01/msg00311.html (9,641 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] "double numbers" and out-of-sequence problems (score: 1): Author: Marty Tippin" <martyt@pobox.com (Marty Tippin); Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:14:29 -0600; If it's the case that giving each QSO a unique serial number doesn't matter, then I'm going to stop bothering to use an incrementing number at all - I'll just hard-code the exchange at 001 (because i; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-01/msg00312.html (11,044 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]