Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+$no\s+subject$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+$no\s+subject$\s*$/: 125 ]

Total 125 documents matching your query.

41. [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 19:12:17 -0800; Hmmm...not in my WL v10.50D. I only see one set like: Shift+F-08 --> MessageShift08 (et.al.) No "ph" to be found anywhere! Tnx & 73... Rick, K6VVA _______________________________________________ Writ; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00250.html (7,312 bytes)
42. [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: STUART MCQUILLIAN <mm0bsm@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:42:37 +0000 (GMT); Hi I wonder if anyone can answer a question i have on networks in a M/M setup when the Pc that the other PC's look at to store the common writelog file has to be restarted does every pc have to conne; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00371.html (7,042 bytes)
43. [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: STUART MCQUILLIAN <mm0bsm@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:10:15 +0000 (GMT); Hi folks thanks for the replies It seems i was correct in thinking that i had to restart the main pc then establish a link and get the others to connect to it. Thought that it may have been done quic; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00373.html (8,183 bytes)
44. RE: [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Chris Burbanks" <g3sjj@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:34:44 -0000; tHOUGHT yOU mIGHT nEED sOME oF tHESE - IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII cHRIS g3sJj Hi folks thanks for the replies It seems i was correct in thinking that i had to restart the main pc then establish a link; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00374.html (9,336 bytes)
45. [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:40:41 -0800; Tnx, Mike. I looked high & low via the Index but ran out of time trying to find the info. Somewhere along the line I had picked up the Alt-W one but couldn't recall where. FYI, your suggested enhance; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00425.html (8,758 bytes)
46. [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "john g." <crazycuda@nac.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:05:04 -0500; Hello, anyone have info on why my 570d is not changing freq when I click on a spot it changes mode ok but not freq. the same com setting work fine in win-eqf no problem so I think it is in wl anyone; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00118.html (6,556 bytes)
47. [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "john g." <crazycuda@nac.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:05:38 -0500; Anyone know what line in the ini files is for telling rig to change freq when you hit on a packet spot. I have my 570 running with wl but it is changing mode but not the freq when I click on a packet; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00119.html (7,039 bytes)
48. [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "D. Campbell" <aa0yx@bresnan.net>; Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:26:17 -0000; I too used writelog and userport for years to run cw on the lpt port and a HAL P38 with Windows XP. It worked great for a few years until I installed SP2, then nothing worked anymore. I did everythin; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-04/msg00046.html (6,922 bytes)
49. Re: [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:08:10 +0000; The .wav files play OK when connected to speakers, and the transmitters keys, but only a steady carrier. Searched the archives and just can't find my problem. Will someone please send me a message bu; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-08/msg00043.html (6,716 bytes)
50. Re: [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: k4sb@bellsouth.net; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:04:01 +0000; Guys, with all due respect, if so many of you think WL is buggy, or too expensive, why in the world are you subscribed to this reflector? Use what you want, but let those of us who thing WL is the gr; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00148.html (8,433 bytes)
51. Re: [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Scott Nichols" <snichols@mvosprey.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:47:16 -0400; Because we would like to get it fixed!!...This is supposed to be the forum to do it...Saying nothing gets nothing done...Maybe if we speak up enough, it will get some attention... Scott VE1OP _______; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00152.html (8,600 bytes)
52. Re: [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:08:38 -0000; VE1OP wrote as below Well said Scott. For those of us who started Windows contest logging with WL, it is sad to see it falling off the pace. The fact that we still subscribe indicates that we'd reall; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00153.html (9,396 bytes)
53. [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Phil Krichbaum" <pfkski@vail.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:48:20 -0700; "3. Have used it networked in a M2 set-up and it worked flawlessly." I have been with several M2, MS and MM groups and have NEVER seen WL work properly in a networked situation which is very annoying; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00184.html (7,099 bytes)
54. Re: [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "K7ZO (Scott Tuthill)" <k7zo@cableone.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:28:41 -0700; I am definitely not a networking specialist but I have used WL in many many multi-op situations with 5 PC's and it works great. And, I have been able to train many ops on how to bring up the network; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00185.html (8,764 bytes)
55. [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Bob Lafont" <bob.lafont@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:42:03 -0600; I am trying to get FSK working with WriteLog and my FT100MP Mark V. I built the interface according to AA5AU's recommendations as his link shown below. http://www.aa5au.com/rttyinterface.html <BLOCKE; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-02/msg00013.html (7,200 bytes)
56. Re: [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:41:35 -0500; Wayne, I'd be happy to complain elsewhere. I didn't view my comments as complaints as much as simple observations of fact. Nobody suggested you get rid of the INI files. Heck, that's how things run n; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00055.html (8,398 bytes)
57. Re: [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Wayne, W5XD" <w5xd@writelog.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 02:45:49 -0000; All, Note that Mr. Ford Peterson forwarded my private email to him to the public list. He has degenerated to public insults, so I will no longer comment on his postings. My apologies to everyone. Way; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00061.html (6,840 bytes)
58. [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: K8fu@aol.com; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:17:50 EDT; Bob.............................. Can you tell us if you are using an interface unit ?? If so....which one ?? Der Frogmeister.................K8FU _______________________________________________ Writ; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00191.html (7,066 bytes)
59. [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "David J. Strout - W2YC" <djsatty@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:23:50 -0000; I realize that this is essentially a Windows question, but since it affects my use of WriteLog I would appreciate someone's help. I run two stations here during contests. Both PCs are networked and b; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-11/msg00085.html (7,083 bytes)
60. Re: [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Jerry Pixton <jpixton@shentel.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 13:46:21 +0000; David, I don't know the Windows answer (seems strange). If you really mean save the log every qso then you can set writelog.ini to do that. Or there is a Fkeys command to do that also. My impression; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-11/msg00101.html (8,365 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]