Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+10\.45M\s+QUestion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+10\.45M\s+QUestion\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] 10.45M QUestion (score: 1): Author: llindblom@juno.com; Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 21:42:07 GMT; Can someone who is literate please interpret the following statement about changes in WriteLog 10.45M from Geek to English" "A conversion program is installed to switch use of WRITELOG.INI over to th; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00075.html (6,709 bytes)
2. RE: [WriteLog] 10.45M Question (score: 1): Author: "Eric Scace K3NA" <eric@k3na.org>; Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:13:59 -0500; The utility allows WL to operate with the various configuration parameters (normally found in the infamous WriteLog.ini file) stored away in the Windows Registry. There are two advantages to this app; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00077.html (8,894 bytes)
3. RE: [WriteLog] 10.45M Question (score: 1): Author: llindblom@juno.com; Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 22:17:51 GMT; Thanks, that was sort of my guess, but I needed a 2nd opinion. Lets hope the registry never gets horked and needs to be edited, because a bad edit in Writelog.ini is one thing bud a bad edit in the r; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00078.html (8,451 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] 10.45M Question (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:14:57 -0800; _________________________________________________________ Not really different. It would seem the cure for either is a reinstall of WriteLog. But in any event, that's why you now have the option to c; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00079.html (7,563 bytes)
5. Re: [WriteLog] 10.45M Question (score: 1): Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 20:00:42 -0600; But, I've seen a bad register edit totally hose window to the point of requiring a complete reinstall of everything. Reinstalling WriteLog is easy but a total reinstall of Windows and the Apps is a p; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00081.html (8,287 bytes)
6. Re: [WriteLog] 10.45M Question (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 03:11:39 +0000; Well, I keep a complete backup here on a spare 8 GB hard drive. It's installed as the slave on the main IDE bus, but I keep the power off by intercepting the red connector and routing it through a sm; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00084.html (8,414 bytes)
7. Re: [WriteLog] 10.45M Question (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 19:19:16 -0800; Right, I wouldn't edit the Registry in this case, I'd just reinstall WriteLog and let it overwrite the registry entries. Or see below for an even better answer. If it's taking you forever, you're doi; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00086.html (8,603 bytes)
8. Re: [WriteLog] 10.45M Question (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 22:48:16 -0800 (PST); Is there documentation somewhere that describes the proper way to reinstall writelog and keep all the settings the way they were before (assuming you have a backup disk with all of your data)? I mean; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00087.html (7,632 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]