- 1. [WriteLog] AFSK and a PTT Port? (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Pixton <jpixton@shentel.net>
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:10:32 +0000
- Now with writelog v11.11 fixing the AFC issue, I am ready to make 2Tone the primary rttyrite TU and move mmtty to the clone window. But... This is Windows 7 64 bit. I have my Flex 5000 with both rece
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2013-04/msg00136.html (8,810 bytes)
- 2. Re: [WriteLog] AFSK and a PTT Port? (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:14:40 -0400
- When I make 2Tone the primary TU for the rttyrite there seems to be no way to key a PTT serial port when I have to use AFSK. As soon as I try to use a rttyrite port, FSK is assumed. Do not use a Rtty
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2013-04/msg00137.html (8,474 bytes)
- 3. Re: [WriteLog] AFSK and a PTT Port? (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Pixton <jpixton@shentel.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 00:06:26 +0000
- Rereading Don's tutorial just now reminded me why I don't want to do what I was trying to do. I must use AFSK with the Flex and because of the NET issue I really don't want 2Tone in control of the tr
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2013-04/msg00139.html (8,582 bytes)
- 4. Re: [WriteLog] AFSK and a PTT Port? (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:41:45 -0400
- I must use AFSK with the Flex and because of the NET issue I really don't want 2Tone in control of the transmitter. NET is not a significant issue with 2Tone ... 2Tone is a completely different parad
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2013-04/msg00140.html (10,009 bytes)
- 5. Re: [WriteLog] AFSK and a PTT Port? (score: 1)
- Author: Ed Muns <w0yk@msn.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:12:12 -0700
- I second all of Joe's comments. Furthermore, the 2Tone AFC and NET "locked on feature" can be effectively disabled by simply zero-beating the station you are working. If CQing, then zero-beat with RI
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2013-04/msg00144.html (10,940 bytes)
- 6. Re: [WriteLog] AFSK and a PTT Port? (score: 1)
- Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 00:25:33 -0500
- I agree with Joe and Ed. However, I would still recommend that users not employ 2Tone in the main Rttyrite window when transmitting AFSK. Despite NET being limited to +/- 60 hz with 2Tone, you cannot
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2013-04/msg00147.html (12,067 bytes)
- 7. Re: [WriteLog] AFSK and a PTT Port? (score: 1)
- Author: Ed Muns <w0yk@msn.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:32:15 -0700
- Good point, Don. This is another reason to use FSK. ;) (Reflector readers, please don't start another AFSK vs. FSK religious thread. I'm just being light-hearted here!) Ed W0YK ______________________
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2013-04/msg00148.html (8,905 bytes)
- 8. Re: [WriteLog] AFSK and a PTT Port? (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Pixton <jpixton@shentel.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:10:34 +0000
- Right on. I want to transmit just where I was calling CQ. And although tuning RIT is nice on a radio that has a knob to twist, the Flex has a little thumb wheel control thing that is extremely awkwar
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2013-04/msg00156.html (13,659 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu