Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+AUTOSAVE\s+\-\s+SERIOUS\s+PROBLEM\s+FOR\s+SERIOUS\s+CONTESTERS\!\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] AUTOSAVE - SERIOUS PROBLEM FOR SERIOUS CONTESTERS! (score: 1)
Author: GW4BLE@btinternet.com (GW4BLE)
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:36:38 -0000
Hello All, Hi Two separate users, one of whom is me, using two versions viz 10.36G and 10.35x have failed to disable autosave by the prescribed method. Surely there is a problem. Wayne? Yes indeed, a
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00050.html (8,334 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] AUTOSAVE - SERIOUS PROBLEM FOR SERIOUS CONTESTERS! (score: 1)
Author: rthorne@tcac.net (Richard Thorne)
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 11:31:52 -0600
I did a search in the Writelog archive. Does the following answer the question? ** For autosave, WL only offers one configuration option: you can tell it the maximum number of QSOs that can be in the
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00055.html (10,141 bytes)

3. [WriteLog] AUTOSAVE - SERIOUS PROBLEM FOR SERIOUS CONTESTERS! (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:09:02 -0500
Steve, 1) What value did you set for AUTOSAVECOUNT, 2) are you sure you typed the parameter name correctly, and 3) what was the CPU speed and memory of the machine(s) in question. At 8P8P we did over
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00056.html (10,088 bytes)

4. [WriteLog] AUTOSAVE - SERIOUS PROBLEM FOR SERIOUS CONTESTERS! (score: 1)
Author: gw3njw@onetel.net.uk (Clive Whelan)
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 13:07:36 -0000
There are clearly some unexplained differences between experiences here, and from my personal perspective they are *not* related to computer speed or RAM. Steve experienced the problem as described,
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00076.html (9,544 bytes)

5. [WriteLog] AUTOSAVE - SERIOUS PROBLEM FOR SERIOUS CONTESTERS! (score: 1)
Author: jpreston1@cox.net (Jim Preston)
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 07:54:57 -0800
Remove the AUTOSAVECOUNT statement from the .ini file. That will disable the autosave feature. Jim N6VH
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00078.html (9,209 bytes)

6. [WriteLog] AUTOSAVE - SERIOUS PROBLEM FOR SERIOUS CONTESTERS! (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 14:34:30 -0500
For those of you who may be reluctant to disable AUTOSAVE, remember that WL journalizes QSOs in a separate ascii file. If WL terminates before the log is saved, it will automatically prompt you about
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00096.html (10,703 bytes)

7. [WriteLog] AUTOSAVE - SERIOUS PROBLEM FOR SERIOUS CONTESTERS! (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:04:22 -0500
First of all, bear in mind that WL writes the entire log file to disk every time it does a save. The only way to avoid this would be a complex record I/O system that would take Wayne a lot of time to
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00099.html (12,048 bytes)

8. [WriteLog] AUTOSAVE - SERIOUS PROBLEM FOR SERIOUS CONTESTERS! (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 04:38:45 +0000
snip Such is true. However, I think I have a work around, at least I never run low on memory. What I do is take control of Virtual Memory, and set it to a value of High and Low to 384. Think I got th
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00106.html (8,211 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu